So, lets have a discussion then.
Based on your knowledge of biology and chem, what am I incorrect about? It's pretty clear that I didn't have a source, as I stated that, along why why I couldn't find one. Its obvious that my 8-9 years since graduation are showing, because I don't use the same terms in discussion that you would like. I wouldn't mind an update if I was incorrect about anything.
My only claim was saying that: just because cannabanoids are more or less exclusively lipid-soluble, they are not excluded from being present as a mixture in water, as they are still subject to density and gravity. Unless I missed something about mixtures vs solutions, and missed something about the thermodynamics involved, I fail to see how that could be an incorrect claim.
I agree that asking for a source is never a bad thing, but it is disrespectful to ask a stranger a question, and accept the answer to that question from an unrelated other. Hence my statement: "Talk to me, not the one who hijacked my response."
[–] mburke1124 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
I'm not saying your correct or incorrect. I'm just saying I asked for a source and you threw out some generic terms and called it a day. What benefit would googling the difference between a solution and a mixture do? No need to get your panties in a bunch. If you don't have any sources that's fine. It just means I'm less inclined to believe you. You stated something as a fact have nothing to back it up. No big deal. The internet is filled with people who make declarative statements with nothing to back up their claims.
[–] Sciency 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
You're mistaking my curt-tone for emotion.
The difference between your view and mine is pretty simple. I assume every word I hear/read is an opinion, unless otherwise stated to be a fact; and you do not.
Also, didn't state anything as a fact, I just stated something. Burden of proof is a broken concept, as it favors precedent over logic. If my evidence is broken, use your own evidence to break my argument down. In today's layman's terms: "Debate me, bro."
If you can't back up your "I have a degree in biology and a minor in chemistry" claims, then you're just doing a SJW-style drive-by in making claims like "what you said sounds like someone who has no real knowledge of chemistry." This harms the community more than incorrect claims do. It is quite literally libel, which is far worse than being incorrect on topic of the psychotropic properties of bong water.
Heh, that is literally what a college student does, you never need to do more to get a 4 year degree. Some do more, but it isn't a requirement.
Sorry to offend you with my expired college degree and differing opinions the rules of discussion, unless you want to talk science, I'll take my time elsewhere. Peace.