I think it would make more fiscal sense if we gave nigger sows a gibbsmedatt check of 2k a mumf, with the caveat that every nigglett it burffs reduces the check by 20%. Instead of mo niggletts mo money, mo niggletts= less money.
Right. However niggers are mostly genetically optimized for matrilineality and matrilocality, not Western or in general temperate societies that historically require intensive male agricultural labor.
Libtard degeneracy is only degeneracy from a temperate climate agriculturalist / patriarchal / civilized point of view. On the other hand for niggers it is actually historically normative. Patriarchy requires female dependence on male labor for survival to be stable. Since in nig societies the females did most of the agricultural work, nignogs almost never had patriarchal systems.
[–] Titanbikes4ever 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Having kids out of wedlock should be a shameful thing that you don't get any assistance for
[–] SirNiggsalot ago
I think it would make more fiscal sense if we gave nigger sows a gibbsmedatt check of 2k a mumf, with the caveat that every nigglett it burffs reduces the check by 20%. Instead of mo niggletts mo money, mo niggletts= less money.
[–] Titanbikes4ever ago
It would make more fiscal sense to give them money as opposed to not giving them any money?
[–] EastKekistaniRealist 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Right. However niggers are mostly genetically optimized for matrilineality and matrilocality, not Western or in general temperate societies that historically require intensive male agricultural labor.
Libtard degeneracy is only degeneracy from a temperate climate agriculturalist / patriarchal / civilized point of view. On the other hand for niggers it is actually historically normative. Patriarchy requires female dependence on male labor for survival to be stable. Since in nig societies the females did most of the agricultural work, nignogs almost never had patriarchal systems.