3
1

[–] SaveTheChildren 3 points 1 point (+4|-3) ago 

Tornadoes are fake and gay

0
2

[–] bdmthrfkr [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Just like you.

2
2

[–] MrPim 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

I think now you just say shit to fuck w people. Like 'The postal system is totally fake and gay' or 'Spaghetti is an illusion'

2
-1

[–] chuckletrousers 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

No, he's a paranoid schizophrenic.

0
1

[–] Thisismyvoatusername 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Well, that was before. Now climate change results in fewer tornadoes. Don’t you believe in science?

1
2

[–] somethingsgottagive 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Confirmation bias much

0
2

[–] bdmthrfkr [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

You can't confirm your bias if you live in a hugbox that never challenges your beliefs. Those people are seriously under informed.

1
2

[–] Spud4ever 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Friggen duh , virtually everything I personally recall having been uttered by either has been refuted by fact or proven to be a deliberate lie.

0
2

[–] sore_ass_losers 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I read elsewhere here a mainstream article that said it's thought it's not as windy across the planet.

1
-1

[–] Spud4ever 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

We could export Gore and Barry to correct that situation.

0
3

[–] bdmthrfkr [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Welp, there go those wind turbines.

2
3

[–] Diggernicks 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

The sierra club has been saying since the 70s nyc would be underwater any day from rising sea levels caused by man made climate change.

0
2

[–] Gorillion 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Got stupid rich liberals to sell up their ocean front properties for cheap though.

0
0

[–] RedditSureDoesSuck ago 

Which Gore bought up, coincidentally enough.

0
4

[–] TendiesHitTheFloor 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

But, south park states Gore was right????

0
4

[–] Energizedbeardedpede 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Cherry picking weather data points over a couple hundred years to encourage fearmongering vs millions of years in existence will typically do that to your doctored predictions

1
2

[–] Diggernicks 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

The global temperature stats don't go back a couple hundred years... Like 150 at most.

0
0

[–] hwong ago 

ice core samples from about 80 million years ago called... they would like a word with you on that temp data range....

0
3

[–] Energizedbeardedpede 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

My point exactly. Hence the models are all bullshit

0
5

[–] Acerphoon 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

It's not only a very small timeframe, it's also retarded. 40% of the land readings are literally just estimates for places without recording equipment.

Most of the actual stations are only in some places. The United States for example has a network of 1200 USHCN stations with data going back to 1895. Those stations basically show a small cooling since the 1920s

But that is when taking all USHCN stations. What the climate experts are doing, is taking these stations (which show a large amount of warming since 1920) for use in the global GSN temperature record, then estimate the temperatures for places without recording equipment and say that the "earth is warming dramatically".

0
0

[–] Energizedbeardedpede ago 

Thank you for your informative reply!

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)