[–] HouseHawkwood 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I've been autistically screeching that we need to contribute the wallgofund me for that very reason so I'm down. Got a website?
If people aren't informed enough to not vote for these people a constitutional amendment won't help/work.
Yes it would. As would an amendment requiring anyone running for office to score 100% on a Constitution Test before getting on the ballot. Democracy only works with an informed and independent electorate. Not a brainwashed one.
[–] Tallest_Skil 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago
attack PAC
Enjoy prison.
[–] 15784664? [S] 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
The defeatist 'don't do anything because we're helpless attitude' is the attitude of complete cowards who are doomed to be slaves. So, unless there is some law I would be breaking (which I don't see here), you can keep your cowardice to yourself, coward.
[–] Tallest_Skil 3 points -3 points 0 points (+0|-3) ago
The defeatist 'don't do anything because we're helpless attitude' is the attitude of complete cowards who are doomed to be slaves.
Yes, and?
unless there is some law I would be breaking
You can’t advocate violence, you can only engage in it.
you can keep your cowardice to yourself, coward.
Yeah, you’ll want to become literate. The only coward here is you. You think that there’s a peaceful solution. You think that you can work within the system. You also think that you can create a PAC that espouses constitutional principles and NOT be arrested or assassinated.
[–] Tallest_Skil 3 points -3 points 0 points (+0|-3) ago
You can vote for ZOG-approved candidates, leave for whiter pastures, call for boycotts, take part in demonstrations, practice civil disobedience, start fundraisers for activists, work in local politics, write essays or books, talk to people on the street, start a YouTube channel, create content, etc. all day long, but none of these activities actually reverse demographic trends. None of these things make the jews afraid enough to actually start giving concessions. Because none of these things are an impediment to their power.
The only positive thing peaceful activities have done is to have awakened people who are capable and willing to commit acts of violence. Dylan Roof himself was a leftist until the Trayvon Martin case, which led him to finding the truth about blacks online. Bowers was a typical cuck, until he too learned online that the white demographic replacement of his city and country were the result of jewish subversion. Both of these acts are unprecedented in America’s postwar history, and are the products of both the desperation of our current political situation as well as the fact that the truth is easier to access today online than ever before. There are two main arguments used by shills to justify why now “isn‘t” the right time for political violence. What follows are refutations for both of them.
1) “The System will become more repressive!” According to these shills, more white violence will result in the system preventing us from saying the truth online and will embolden the system to come after guns. Okay, great! The System will be preventing many normal whites from the release valve of talking to strangers online. It would make them more willing to find like-minded people in real life, where they might actually do something. Not only that but harsher “hate speech” laws would result in many normal whites becoming radicalized by facing possible jail time for simply saying the wrong things. As ever more whites are jailed for wrongthink, whites will begin to feel repressed by the system. This will awaken our collective identity and make us more willing to fight. As for guns, they’re are almost worthless in modern war. A Cohen Act-style seizure would likely result in kicking off the race war, which is why jews only ever ban guns incrementally. Here’s what William Pierce wrote about the effects of political violence:
The major purposes of political terror, always and everywhere, is to force the authorities to take reprisals and to become more repressive, thus alienating a portion of the population and generating sympathy for the terrorists. And the other purpose is to create unrest by destroying the population’s sense of security and their belief in the invincibility of the government.
2) “Just wait for the right moment, guys!” These shills claim that now “isn‘t” the time to start engaging in political violence because a collapse is “right around the comer” and will magically fix everything. If whites can‘t even organize now–when we’re still a majority and don’t have the stress of worrying about how we’ll so much as feed our families–how can we be expected to organize during a collapse? The future that whites have in store for them if they don’t fight is a South America-style slow death. Countries like Brazil and Argentina never faced a societal crisis which forced whites to reflect on their identity. As such, despite massive economic crises, whites never regained their racial consciousness. As a result, there are essentially no racially pure whites in these countries. Once more, in 2008, America had a major economic crisis which was the result of jewish banks lending currency to spics and niggers to buy houses they couldn‘t afford. Most whites lost over half of their net worth during this crisis. Some lost everything. How did they respond? They sat on their couches and waited for things to get better, or LARPed in 18th century costumes while holding banners assuring everybody they weren’t racist. Last, it‘s much better understood today how the economy functions than it was during the depression. The Federal Reserve and banks have many tools to stimulate and incentivize investment. Today, we see many consumerist nonwhites driving the economy, as opposed to whites who become cautious and save during hard times.
Roof and Bowers have helped us tremendously. Without Roof there wouldn’t be nearly as much of an effort to remove confederate statues, which has caused many whites to feel our identity is under attack. Charlottesville never would have happened either, which wouldn’t have shown us just how much public support we have–as well as teaching us the lessons of what not to do far sooner than we otherwise may have learned them. Bowers’ action will result in more jews leaving the West, making it easier for us to take power since they’re our only real threat. Both of these attacks will be used by the left to justify repression against whites when Trump is no longer in power. There needs to be organization for political violence if we’re going to any chance of coming to power. I’m not going to speculate on what this entails or tell people what to do. My advice is to read history, particularly about modern groups fighting ZOG, and think deeply about what it’s going to take to disrupt the life of the average white and to get the average nonwhite to feel that the benefits of staying in the US no longer outweigh the dangers.
[–] ardvarcus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I believe nationalists could organize loosely on the Internet to attack liberal, progressive institutions in all sorts of ways. We've seen how effective the Proud Boys have been, and they were created as a joke. Organize on the Net, take action in the real world. That's how to do it.
The organizations would have to be loose and informal, because the FBI and other traitorous organizations would infiltrate any tight-knit groups and undermine them from within. The left is slavering at the mouth with eagerness to find actual alt.right groups to point the finger at, as a justification of their false narrative. We'd need to organize out in the open, without specifying individual identities or assigning individuals tasks.
[–] 15787217? [S] ago
The good news is this is just a PAC. So it's just a matter of if you like what the PAC is doing you can donate and if not you can pass. No organization to infiltrate this way.
The idea is to run attack ads against dual citizen candidates. We fundraise enough to make commercials, if people like them, we fundraise again to place the ads. That's basically it. Of course, there are many details in that to work out, but that's the basic idea.
Think of these swift boat ads that were run against John Kerry: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phqOuEhg9yE
[–] HouseHawkwood ago
This is a very good point. We need to adhere to the concepts of 4th generation warfare. Question is, is there a way to do something like a PAC without exposing to the your aforementioned risks?