0
1

[–] Cloudrdr 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

In and of itself, the word FULSOME does not seem to actually FIT in the sense of the judge's comments...

fulsome (fo͝olˈsəm)►

adj.     Offensively flattering or insincere. See Synonyms at unctuous.
adj.     Offensive to the taste or sensibilities.
adj.     Usage Problem Copious or abundant.

How does that relate? Perhaps did he intend the 'abundant' meaning? Certainly is an ambiguous word for a jurist to use. Generally, they like to make things clearer, not more opaque.

0
2

[–] WTFChuck [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I agree. "Fulsome" is a weird word. And the fact that Sally Yates used it too regarding her testimony is weird. CODE talkers.

But I totally could see the Brit GCHQ picking the name "Project Fulsome" as a jibe at Trump being "offensive to taste or sensibilities". Aren't they so freaking clever? Bet they're not feeling nearly so clever these days. It's so often Hubris that gets these a@@h*les

0
3

[–] UK_Bloke_Awoke 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Many of us over here 🇬🇧 wholeheartedly and completely reject the actions that GCHQ seem to have taken...

Although POTUS is ceaselessly maligned by our MSM, I know that he has brought many people into the light, as they see through the lies and innuendos..

0
1

[–] derram 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

https://archive.fo/jKqmN :

Greg Rubini on Twitter: "37. Hey Judge Sullivan, What the H*LL ???

what are you telling us?

and right at the START of the hearing!

are you telling us (and telling someone else) that you know about Project FULSOME, and the British Intel GCHQ spying on Trump under Hussein obama request?… /cLiqGPEoRY"


This has been an automated message.