0
1

[–] carnold03 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Child support is less about providing for children and primarily about protecting the government from the escalating financial liabilities for the state in providing for children born into dysfunctional and "non-traditional" households. Once a person understands the governments interest in the industry of child support, it provides an unsettling perspective that all reproductive age adults should understand that they are merely cattle in the governments eyes. Nothing more.

0
1

[–] Native [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

We know what you say is true because women on child support don't have to prove where and on what they spent the money on.

0
1

[–] Pluviou5 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It was established when women were SAHMs, but that's clearly not the norm anymore. The gynocentric child support laws should not be followed by the courts. They should be abolished due to being archaic.

Edit: Sahm is stay at home mothers

0
1

[–] Native [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I don't know what sahm is

Courts should have all laws struck down ever 100 years and start over from scratch, keep the constitution and erase the bureaucracy

0
1

[–] ForTheUltimate 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You don’t have to “make” girls into materialistic, exploitative, amoral whores. It’s the natural state of femaleness. All you have to do is remove social constraints on female sexuality and let nature take its course.

word