0
0

[–] CR302 ago 

He pled guilty to this so they would have to taken his testimony as evidence...any testimony he gave them about wwhat ever he decided to tell them. What he knows and shares becomes states evidence...he spilled his guts to force their hand. He fell on his sword.

0
0

[–] Bushpilot ago 

You use tricks when you can't do it legally.

0
0

[–] numina18 ago 

I hear pardons are really nice to receive as Christmas gifts......

0
0

[–] singlebrain1 ago 

Miranda rights?

0
0

[–] pwdwp [S] ago 

The wording used when a person is read the Miranda Warning, also known as being ‘Mirandized,’ is clear and direct:

  • You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you? With these rights in mind, do you wish to speak to me?

Are there exceptions to when the officer needs to read Miranda Rights?

Answer: If they’re not really interrogating about an existing crime, they would not read the Miranda rights. An example would be a DUI arrest. In that instance, most of the evidence is gathered prior to the arrest; there’s really not interrogation after the fact, therefore in many of those cases there is not a Miranda warning given.

1
-1

[–] telleveryoneyouknow 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

In all fairness, he’s the idiot who fell for that rookie ass shit.

0
0

[–] Bushpilot ago 

Maybe not fall for it but use the situation to plant the seed to be used now to kick their asses.

0
0

[–] telleveryoneyouknow ago 

I like your theory better :)

0
0

[–] Anonymouse_cheese ago 

Have you people not been following Q?

0
0

[–] flatbush71 ago  (edited ago)

Outstanding Cheese.

These youngsters have no concept of rogue, ruse or red herring.

Many are so gullible and easily misled, that its becoming truly frightening.

https://twitter.com/BarbaraRedgate?lang=en

0
0

[–] Anonymouse_cheese ago 

I'm Anonymouse_cheese but you are right about the rest.

0
0

[–] pwdwp [S] ago 

I do, why the question?

0
0

[–] Anonymouse_cheese ago 

Because Q already explained why flynn pleaded guilty to something he'd been cleared of. He did it purposely. Think back, look back.

0
5

[–] KueAnaan 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Just giving a tour implies that he wasn't under oath.

0
4

[–] MolochHunter 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I'll tell ya somethin else. The 302 form used to prove his 'lie' ? Strzok signed it in August 2017. 8 months after the meeting

0
1

[–] DawnPendraig 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

McCabe is known to have a personal beef with Gen Flynn too.

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)