[–] singlebrain1 ago
Miranda rights?
The wording used when a person is read the Miranda Warning, also known as being ‘Mirandized,’ is clear and direct:
Are there exceptions to when the officer needs to read Miranda Rights?
Answer: If they’re not really interrogating about an existing crime, they would not read the Miranda rights. An example would be a DUI arrest. In that instance, most of the evidence is gathered prior to the arrest; there’s really not interrogation after the fact, therefore in many of those cases there is not a Miranda warning given.
[–] telleveryoneyouknow 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
In all fairness, he’s the idiot who fell for that rookie ass shit.
[–] Anonymouse_cheese ago
Have you people not been following Q?
[–] flatbush71 ago (edited ago)
Outstanding Cheese.
These youngsters have no concept of rogue, ruse or red herring.
Many are so gullible and easily misled, that its becoming truly frightening.
[–] MolochHunter 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I'll tell ya somethin else. The 302 form used to prove his 'lie' ? Strzok signed it in August 2017. 8 months after the meeting
[–] DawnPendraig 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
McCabe is known to have a personal beef with Gen Flynn too.
[–] CR302 ago
He pled guilty to this so they would have to taken his testimony as evidence...any testimony he gave them about wwhat ever he decided to tell them. What he knows and shares becomes states evidence...he spilled his guts to force their hand. He fell on his sword.