[–] 15366065? 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 2 years ago
[–] 15365996? 0 points (+0|-0) 2.5 minutes ago
Is there any correlation between The 68–95–99.7 rule (which depicts a wave) and "think waves" from drop 2527?
[–] 15366376? 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 2 years ago
I don't think so. It is not really a wave, or a wave function, but rather a graph of a normal probability distribution.
[–] 15365815? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 2 years ago
68–95–99.7 rule
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/68%E2%80%9395%E2%80%9399.7_rule
[–] 15366065? ago
[–] 15365996? 0 points (+0|-0) 2.5 minutes ago
Is there any correlation between The 68–95–99.7 rule (which depicts a wave) and "think waves" from drop 2527?
[–] 15366376? ago
I don't think so. It is not really a wave, or a wave function, but rather a graph of a normal probability distribution.