0
3

[–] EmJayGee 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

A guilty plea isn't proof of anything at all. That's not how law nor proof work.

More generally is means that the person chose to claim responsibility for some action, usually in exchange for some reduced sentence or speedier trial. It can be evidence for further legal action which usually carries weight since the person swore that they had committed such crime and often as part of the deal signed an affidavit claiming that others committed related crimes.

0
1

[–] Stonenchizel [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Great comment @EmJayGee ...........😉👌

0
1

[–] EmJayGee 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I think people apply hard logic principles to soft human situations incorrectly. You always hear about people "proving" things about politics or anthropology. Even "settled law" isn't, that's why we have a system of courts. My background is math and computers and I'm Asperger's so I love hard truth and wish there was some of it with people but it's just not there; the sooner you realize this the sooner you'll start to make more sense of it all.

4
-4

0
1

[–] GritD2 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Never understood how negotiations for a hotel ( that was never built) is horrible collusion while delivery of uranium to same "enemy" is ok!

Dems probably assume all deals are crooked, because all of their deals are.