0
16

[–] Redditlostme 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago  (edited ago)

After watching the 4 minutes documentary, please consider watching the 6.5 hours documentary explaining EVERYTHING about Molten Salt Reactor, other reactor types, renewables, thorium, plutonium, uranium and space travel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oK6Rs6yFsM

The first 45 Minutes will show you how you can produce energy in space. The only type of reactor we now know that it can operate in space successfully is the Molten Salt Reactor with Thorium as burning material. This reactor type HAS to be developed, othere wise there will never be a space force.

I urge everybody to watch this documentary. In 2013 I went to the thorium energy conference at CERN in Switzerland https://indico.cern.ch/event/222140/ . In contrary to Tesla, Thorium is not "free". It is just "very cheap". And I doubt Teslas invention can be commercialized however the Molten Salt Reactor was successfully running at ORNL in the 50/60s for four years so the physics is sound and the reactor works. Please ask me anything you want.

China understood this and they are already building their mechanized flying force with thorium reactors: https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/12/china-spending-us3-3-billion-on-molten-salt-nuclear-reactors-for-faster-aircraft-carriers-and-in-flying-drones.html

Obama has already given the rest of the nuclear technology from ORNL to the Son of the former president of China: http://fortune.com/2015/02/02/doe-china-molten-salt-nuclear-reactor/

0
0

[–] Qsentmehere ago 

We've had ET technology since the Roswell incident. The Space Force is just Trump/Q bringing slight attention to the inevitable disclosures. Remember movie 3: TBA? The extraterrestrial presence is movie 3.

0
0

[–] MolochHunter [S] ago 

cool, thx for the links

0
0

[–] Revel4ti0n ago 

Thank you.

The last years there were allot of news regarding moving away from nuclear power in the classic fashion. Now i know more why there were voices to not fully disband and wait for further technological advancement.

Do you have more Information about power plant Adoption beside china and i guess England and the broad political sphere to adopt the technology?

0
0

[–] 42641 ago 

Thank you @Redditlostme I had no idea this was even possible.

0
20

[–] HenryCabotLodge 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

Thorium (90 on periodic chart) can easily run the world for 4,000+ years. The initial cost to build the reactors (molton salt) is high. But, they cannot be waponized and thorium is like DIRT. It is everywhere. Most of China and India have zillions of tons of throium. Most of Nevada is Thorium. Oz has Throium. It can run forever and ever for free. /// Whether apocryphal or not, the fact that J.P. Morgan would not continue to fund Tesla's free energy machine at Wardenclyffe Tower project in NJ, shows that no government (or central bank) is interested in funding "free" energy.

0
1

[–] PGLiterati 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Thomas Pynchon in Against the Day wrote a novel to the full effect of your last sentence.

0
5

[–] Unreasonable 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

You're still using nuclear material, Uranium, for the power source. However the design of the nuclear reactor is different. With a Thorium shield the reaction can't "run away" like current designs, ie FuckusShima.

A Thorium reactor is like having a gas pedal in your car, the more you press, the faster you go, take your foot off and the car will eventually slow down.

Todays reactors are like having the throttle at max and driving with the brake. This is why they are stupid.

0
7

[–] Redditlostme 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

The reason the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor (LIFTR) or Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) was abandoned is completely explained in this documentation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oK6Rs6yFsM There are various reasons. The "free energy" argument is one of them but it is much more complicated.