[–] [deleted] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
[–] Pattern_Blind 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That is kinda how I feel about the free stuff and gibs argument. Obviously some people are getting ten trillion dollars worth of free stuff. How can I vote for some of that?
[–] Holonomic 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Well, probably a lot of it went to Queerbama's pretty pockets when he screwed the country out of all that 'bailout' money during his first round of golf, err, I mean his first term. I think it was in the first year of his first term, but maybe the second. It didn't take fag-boy long to do it. IT hasn't helped much. GM has already pissed away the money they got from it, and apparently they didn't change their SOPs because they're in the same boat again. I wonder if 'he' will try and steak credit for that too, like he's done for almost everything else Trump's accomplished. How much was the bailout for.....was it 20 trillion? It was an Ofagboy butt load o'cash.
[–] Rawrination ago
You're right! They should at least call someone a godamn kike nigger faggot or its just being rude!
[–] EyeOfHorus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Why was the Pentagon designed with 5 sides? Its totally inefficient use of space and the original concept between roads and waterways did not form a consistent pentagram shape.
Its right in front of you, they don't even try to hide it.
Why did 9/11 attacks end only after retaliation with a ballistic missile launched at the Pentagon?
[–] Waiyu_Dudat 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Democratic (includes republic) govts are the biggest threat to its own people. A monarchy has more incentive to produce legitimate results, not just empty promises. Why would a king run his own country into debt? With the invention of the gun, we should re attempt monarchy. The nation supports a king that would never take their weaponry. The nation supports a king that defends from invaders.
We've done democracy/republics enough throughout history to have a clear record that all all of the claims against monarchy are expressed 3 fold in a system that allows votes.
What is popular is not always right. What is right is not always popular.
I know among Americans, liberty precedes all. Instead I believe voting is a distraction the elites provide. Voting is a drug. Highly stimulating, distracting from cold reality that we are all slaves, false sense of reward, energy spent that you believe you are improving society but you are giving power to people you can't hold accountable. I used to be libertarian, until I learned more about monarchies and how the population actually lives, not just relying on what we were taught in (((public school))). A state is a tool, neither evil nor good. How you prepare and use the state determines its morality.
[–] RampancyLambentRaven 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Don't these crooks use book keepers and accountants? Just audit them all already. Crooks. All of them. Crooks. The Pentagon has some real Bernie Madoff's. Black operations tints the money color black Dark webs getting spun so politically correct Watching everybody fight each other, sister versus brother Peace versus war, rich against the poor Different versus different, bed versus the floor Wall versus the door Shore β black, water β black, money β black Moneybag and greed back in season Swing full βtil someone turns on after oasis
[–] HenryCabotLodge 2 points 25 points 27 points (+27|-2) ago (edited ago)
Gee. Um Dark Programs. Dark OPs. Murdering folks in MEast. Murdering US Citizens when it fits the Dark OPs plans. Dark OP Fun at the OK Federal Building. S-4 Area 51 Aurora TR-B3 ..... How much time do we have? Only ending what started in 1947, 1951 and 1954 will rid the world of this Dark OP cancer. Will I see it in my lifetime? Pretty unlikely. But someday, someday the good guys win in the end. Read the Bible. God Wins in the End. Eventually (Eventually) the Dark OPs all lose.
[–] robot7247 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Will I see it in my lifetime? Pretty unlikely.
In the early 90s I encountered someone well placed at Rockwell International's aerospace division. We were at a tradeshow getting lunch and the topic of Aurora came up. He immediately stood up and left the table when it did. We thought he had an urgent bathroom need and after 20 minutes someone went to look for him. He was outside the hall on a bench and apparently quite spooked. He said we did not understand how jammed up he'd be if that comment was overheard by the wrong person. He did not come back to the table. Years later another well placed guy at Boeing made an off the cuff remark to me "You have no idea what's at Wright-Patterson. I'm in the business and I can't believe it." but would not elaborate further other than a "Maybe someday we can talk about it.".
This was intriguing stuff and most likely what exactly it entailed will never be known. Research & work product derived from classified military programs get folded into new programs and, stay classified. The F-117A did not come out until 1988. It's first flight was a decade prior, and its development started in the late 1960s. All the aggregated dark programs that enabled it to fly got filed away forever. You see the final result but know nothing of what it took to get there.
[–] JastheMace 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
A guy I knew when I was in the AF worked out at Area 51 maintaining the F-117. They gave him extra money for an apartment and civilian clothes because military BDU's were off limits. They had to fly out there every day on Janice airlines which only does those flights. He said he never saw anything outside of normal military stuff while there, but everything is seperated so you only have contact with your project. So the regular base and military buildings that are always shown, are regular buildings and such. Who knows what is hidden in the mountains near there though.
[–] talmoridor-x 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
the good guys win in the end
so just wait and do nothing
Christcucks hate responsibility
[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
[–] CrustyBeaver52 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Active combat operations don't come cheap.
I'm not so sure the powers that be wanted to disclose how much all of those wars were actually costing - Bush and Obama were basically continuously at war.
[–] boredTech 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I really don't think that's it. From 1984 - 2014 we've had ~1.7M soldiers in active duty each year. This would be a cost of $196B for each soldier unaccounted for. If each soldier would fire one $400 bullet per minute it would take them 932 years to waist that much cash.
[–] CrustyBeaver52 ago
I'm sure it's not all of it, but I've seen video's of how you guys fight, and nobody consumes ammo faster in this world than the American soldier. Two guys in a house? Drop a five hundred pound bomb on them:)
Hell, you even have vehicles to carry the vehicles that carry all of that extra ammunition for you.
It's the American way!