0
0

[–] QTEAM2PATRIOT ago 

never went to the moon in '69 either.

0
0

[–] UsedToBeCujoQuarrel ago 

Of course not. You weren't invited.

0
0

[–] obsecro-morietur ago 

Got any links to support the failed Russia - Musk rocket discussion?

Very well documented, are you aware of the launch date of the rover?

0
1

[–] Baby_Momma_Drama 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Your numbers are all fucked up.

Mars is 33m miles, so the payload would have been traveling at 7500mph which is completely doable by aircraft let alone spacecraft.

0
1

[–] derram 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=ihxYC1P4EaI :

NASA’s InSight Mars landing: what it really took - YouTube


This has been an automated message.

1
2

[–] ItsBad 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Part of the purpose of things like NASA is to get people to follow blindly without questioning things. It's on purpose that they make things nonsensical , illogical, and inconsistent. It's to get you to doubt yourself and then trust in the authorities because it's easier.

Also that "female scientist" looks like a man in drag.

0
0

[–] i_scream_trucks ago 

It's on purpose that they make things nonsensical , illogical, and inconsistent.

Your retarded ass not graduating 5th grade doesnt make what theyre saying any of that.

0
4

[–] sonuvspam 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

You promised me an attractive female scientist..i'm disappointed.

0
0

[–] shadow332 [S] ago 

Note I put the ((())).

0
0

[–] cursedcrusader ago 

Really this hits the nail on the head.