[–] Pubiclouse 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
I'm in AZ Mexicans have pretty thick shitskins. I hate virtue signalling White cucks more than almost anything!
[–] eggsbenedict94 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
This is why policing language is asinine. And by extension governments and one world governments that censor free spech are cancer.
You essentially have a large body of power made up of a small number of individuals from similar backgrounds(soyboy sillicon valley fags) making decisions for a shit ton of people from different nationalities/backgrounds whose culture and histories they know nothing about. And how could you expect them too? The world is a big place and it's ridiculous to think that any company would have in depth knowledge of random cultures and also be able to deduce which particular user is engaging in offensive language or not.
Either way, you're better off not policing user names in general but Soyny can't help it after they relocated their headquarters to California.
[–] Nomoresjwbs 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Why do I give a shit what Sony does to a Mexican?
[–] prairie 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
So, bring on the flood of Kike_1234 usernames!
We have to keep in mind that the PSN is a global thing and we have to at least take into small consideration of how other people feel. I look forward to changing my name. I’m most likely going to change it to a username based off my name and “0615” at the end. I’m thinking something along the lines of “Nigger_0615”. I’m not really interested into changing it into any of the different way you spell my nickname as I’d like to avoid any future problems and offend anyone.”
Edited slightly.
[–] acheron2012 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
The US government needs to use it’s powers of world domination for good instead of evil - just once. It might even garner them some much needed good will.
We need a Constitutional amendment (to block the never ending stream of treasonous judges) that strips all corporations of HUMAN RIGHTS. The only reason to form a corporation is to avoid legal liability for your actions. The whole “getting investors” tale is a false narrative. I assume you people will invest in your company if it is any good. No. Corporations are strictly so the owners won’t go to prison for selling products that kill people.
The hard part is the Constituitonal amendment. Then the easy part is to enforce FREE speech at all these hotbeds of sedition: Sony, Facebook, Google: NBC — ALL OF THEM.
If they don’t want to allow free speech they are free to move their business to some other country. Perhaps the People’s Republic of China will be more to their liking.
[–] throwaway888 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
If you sell a million cribs. Some of those cribs are going to kill babies. If you sell a million cars some of those cars will kill people.
[–] acheron2012 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
I was thinking more along the lines of the Roundup or Aspertaim cases.
But you do bring up an important point. Lawyers get paid to make compelling arguments that fantasy is reality. Perhaps the most important thing the law can do is to protect us from those that seek to weaponize it.
[–] ShinyVoater ago
It looks like what you really want is to strip the "limited" from "limited liability". Having corporations be legal persons simplifies quite a few things, but you're right in them having too much latitude.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
[–] [deleted] 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
[–] Patriot_saintz ago
Their last good game was Blood Dragon. Everything else after was the same shitty reskins with woke politics.
You're really not missing out by ignoring Assassin's Kangz: We Wuz Spartanz
[–] oyy_veyy_goyy ago
Just out of curiosity, what was the avatar that got your banned?
[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago