[–] thedarkknight2020 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I couldn’t even make it through the original Times article. What I did read was basically the Times whining that they are not able to call Trump anti-semitic because his son-in-law, daughter, and grandchildren are Jewish.
They never once considered the possibility that maybe Trump is not anti-semitic.
[–] Stonenchizel [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Right! I truly don't think he could possibly be. It was just another one of Hillary's made up Clinton Dirty Style Politics!
[–] TexasConservativeFag 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago
The same new York times who denied the Holocaust. Lol these people are beyond stupid
[–] Trueseeker_90 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
All the New York Times is good for is toilet paper.
[–] RakerKey 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
No I think that it would smear your buttcheeks too lol
Its basically only good for burning