[–] 1ScubaGurl ago
There’s a difference politically between being gay, and rather, a gay US Senator representing South Carolina. While it’s true no one SHOULD care, SCers *care.
[–] HenryCabotLodge ago
Hmm. Interesting comment. I have thought that the "gay" angle wasn't enough to take down Graham. Like F SFO everybody and their dog is gay. They spit on you if you are not gay. ... So probaably not that. Graham dn seem to be motivated by stolen money (perhaps for his campaign), but it dn feel like money. HOWEVER, from thinking about your comment, it may have been "underage" -- could be girls, but if gay - boys. They prob had him blackmailed on underage boys. If so, that would be explosive and fatal if it came out. - so that (hey pure Fing speculation here folks - just thinking out loud). It would be a career ender and likly to bull him into submission. But why would ONLY no name have the dirt? Why would it be that if No Name goes down the puppet strings go down. Like stolen emails, would not no names lieutenants have access to the dirt. Just asking. I dn know the ultimate answers, but I am glad Graham is going after Hillary.
[–] SueRitz5 ago
This body language video by Mandy Bombard is rather telling. https://bombardsbodylanguage.com/2017/02/17/body-language-lindsey-graham-and-john-mccain-relationship/