[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I support this fully. They are so messed up over there that they'd spend the next 100 years trying to make a fully inclusive army. Designing extra stretchy uniforms to allow for pregnant troops, retrofitting larger hatches on their tanks so that fat feminists can fit through, deciding how many kinds of latrines they'd need for all those mystery genders, making rules about whether purple or blue hair is allowed with a dress uniform... it'd be hilarious. In the mean time, the last of europe's real soldiers would quit in disgust, so that eventually Greece could probably fight the whole EU to a standstill all by itself.
[–] 15015559? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Says a member of the country which has allowed female "soldiers" in damn near every unit. I'm sure those femarines and femrangers will work out great for you guys though!.
Seriously though, as usual America leads the way with the cuckery, by a long fucking margin. Good job the US propaganda department is up to scratch so they can pretend its other countries that really have the problem though
This is another step in the EU's quest to remove the sovereignty of the member nations. At the moment, member nations must use the EU currency; and adopt EU law, which is written in the EU parliament and enforced in the EU court of justice. The only thing lacking is the EU army to put power behind these laws. That being said, I think that it has little to do with NATO, but more to do with establishing a government over the whole of Europe.
I don't see how a European army can be a good thing. You need to remember that the people who run the EU and the people in the EU that make the laws are NOT elected. They appoint themselves. So, giving them their own Europe-wide army to play with on the world stage will not lead to anything good.
If they just wanted to replicate the cover that NATO provides now, why would they want to exclude the world's most powerful ally? Maybe if other countries want to try a Brexit they might find themselves with a large EU army paying them a "goodwill" visit? Do they want to fight people that the US would not agree to? Do they want to take on the US.
Merkel is a useless cunt, and Macron is a rothschild puppet.
However, a properly designed EU army is a fucking great idea (t. a European). I don't trust America at all, you're terrible allies (if I'm generous) - for all a multi-national army has its issues, I'd still prefer it over the current reality of America spying on everyone, forcing everyone to use their tech and be their meatshield for their retarded cold war w/ russia, and then bitching at them over shit it doesn't understand, whilst being a hypocritical bunch of assholes.
Seriously, you are NOT good allies. I'm not trying to be a dick there, but you are hypocritical, arrogant, and backstabbing as hell. What else could I expect from a country that still occupies multiple euro countries, especially germany, and then bitches at them that they aren't paying for their occupation?
Honestly, I dream of the US withdrawing from Nato, it would be truly fantastic.
Hey - some of us know - most are blinded and brain washed, but few of us are trying to educate them as much as we can - with a few arrests of some big shots (HRC will be a mayor one) they will listen instead of calling us conspiracy theorist (read terrorists) and we appreciate your help and the help from Q and Trump. I talked to my assistant in my bank the other day, and the conversation started with small talk - I said I had been up all night because I waited for a speech from Donald Trump - she said to me: It must be difficult for you to bring up your love for Trump and his presidency to your friends, because nobody likes him - do you have any friends that wanna listen to you talk about him? I was in shock!
[–] 15015319? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
America First may not be what you think.
Beyond the obvious reason for the motto “America First” become popular, there are many reasons to believe that Trump is also referring to the powerful and influential political non-interventionist group American First Committee (AFC). Establish in 1940, the AFC was organized to oppose the American involvement in WW2 by challenging Roosevelt’s deceptive campaign. The committee with 800K members arose against the intervention accordingly with 4 principles:
• The United States must build an impregnable defense for America • No foreign power, nor group of powers, can successfully attack a prepared America • American democracy can be preserved only by keeping out of the European war. • “Aid short of war” weakens national defense at home and threatens to involve America in war abroad.
No wonder if you have found “coincidences” with Trump’s political views and government actions.
Trump wants NATO dismantled.