0
0

[–] 14985213? ago 

Why would he not just fucking arrest some people already, or failing that, just fucking kill them?

How exactly are all these people going to scheme and plot if they have two bullets in they're skull, and are slowly decomposing in the ground?

Riddle me that please.

0
1

[–] 14985423? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

We don't have all the judges in place that we need. Would you prefer we arrest people now, they go to trial, and have corrupt judges let them off the hook (with no possibility at retrial)?

Look at what happened to the Muslim school shooter training camp people. They got let off the hook by corrupt prosecutors. Do you want to take that gamble when we only have one shot? I sure as shit don't.

Besides, whether you believe in Q or not, I really don't care. We're on the same team and want these fuckers to burn.

0
0

[–] 14985523? ago 

  • Arrest people with obvious evidence

  • Judge throws it out

  • Release the evidence publicly

  • Public fucking hates the judge, it is clearly a mistrial

  • Allow the public to extract vigilante justice from the judge

  • No more corrupt judges willing to act in such a manner

  • Let vigilantes kill the ex-defendant

  • No need for a re-trial

Wow, that was so fucking hard!. So damn hard to solve! It's obviously such an insanely convoluted plan though it could never work!.

You presume that the whole "we only have one shot" shit means you cant' do anything. Fuck. That. Noise. Do we "have it all" or not? This brainlet desire to follow rules and procedures will fucking doom the entire planet. Can you not get it through your skull the other side is not following the rules? Can you not comprehend how easy and varied the ways around this problem are?

We're on the same team and want these fuckers to burn.

I thoroughly agree here, but the solution is simple. Just burn them. Literally if needs be, it would be throughouly deserved. If that state is unwilling to use its monopoly on violence, it can just step aside and not interfere with a temporary incursion by the citizenry into its domain.

At present, the state will happily crush any worm who dares intrude on that monopoly, whilst protecting the rich, powerful, and well placed who happen to fall under the umbrella of "different rules for the rich and powerful". That's beyond contemptible or weak, it makes the state actively the enemy.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] 14985317? ago 

Everyone? You can't believe that. Tell me how Q has ruined your life to the extent you are trying this hard to discredit.