[–] obvious_throwaway1 3 points 2 points 5 points (+5|-3) ago (edited ago)
I'm personally willing to give Q a chance, purely because history has shown me that anything @Tallest_Shill (whoops I mean @Tallest_Skil, damn the name is so close to the accurate one I always mix them up!) is against is usually directly tied to whatever JIDF is funding opposition to, which is almost always something I should either carefully investigate for evidence of something criminal or outright lies/pandering/propaganda.
I'm not saying the @Tallest_Shill meter is 100% accurate, but it's a damn good barometer of a place to start. He's not the biggest piece of shit around, but he's one of the loudest and most consistent with his JIDF copy-pasta jobs.
[–] Tallest_Skil 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
I'm personally willing to give Q a chance
It was proven to be a hoax a year ago, you subhuman retard.
anything Tallest_Skil is against is usually directly tied to whatever JIDF is funding opposition to
JIDF copy-pasta jobs.
[–] 1RealHeretic 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I never believed it because the electoral college decides who is President. Then when I saw a hands off policy with Isreal, that's the literal litmus test, for me. It was entertaining though... Once Q came out, independent PissahGayte investigation came to a stop. It's obvious that it's another drama soap opera meant to keep us on our couches instead of outside manifesting the results we desire with our own two hands.
[–] Mike_Foster 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Was skeptical back when Q first started getting popular but it's the fan club.
[–] FreeRebel 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I lost interest when Trump went to the far east and Q said it wdb a whole new world when he got back. And he'd have a YUGE announcement. ("Lock her up"???) The announcement turnt out to be some new trade agreement. Yawn. I began to suss out the "cold reading" elements of the commentary. So much vagueness and inviting the audience to fill in the blanks, then go back & take credit. Now I'm confused bc that piece came out where the guy said he was one of the Q gang, & told how it worked. Yet nobody seems to have slowed down. And what happened to Corsi? Is he in or out or what? Now I think it's just pointless entertainment.
[–] FreeRebel 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Here is the item from The Federalist that I mentioned earlier. https://thefederalist.com/2018/10/29/trolling-fleecing-co-creator-q-hoax-explains-dangerous-evolution/
[–] SukkhaMadiqqa 0 points 13 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago (edited ago)
Didn't believe it at the start.
Things got kind of interesting around the FISA Memo release, but while a lot happened, a lot didn't happen. What did happen was REALLY interesting though. This is when I started paying attention to Q posts thinking maybe there as SOME truth to it. I was 50/50, and would actually start talking about it with people, with the caveat that it could be bullshit. It all depended on things actually happening.
After successive months of nothing happening (truly nothing has happened since the memo and promise of DECLAS), my confidence plummeted. By the time I was comfortable outright calling out Q followers was last week with the elections. With 11/11 having passed, anyone who defends Q is just fucking retarded.
[–] zyklon_b [S] 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
thank you for commenting komrade
what is best way to steer Qtard to see through the bullshit?
[–] SukkhaMadiqqa 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I am sure that like everything else, it depends on the person.
Some need guidance. Some need to be outright told what to think. Others need to come to realizations themselves.
Need to cover all the angles.