[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] 14859729? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
An order can be refused if the order given is ordering something illegal or immoral. In a case like that the order would still stand and the personel involved would be replaced with those willing to carry it out. Those refusing the order would in all probability be facing charges and a courts marshall. They have their rights, even in the military's UCMJ. This article's header is in the form of a question, not a statement. CNN, consider the source.
[–] 14859880? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Please think logically for a moment before posting things such as this. The building of camps to house an influx of illegal invaders while deciding the logistics of their expulsion is not an immoral or illegal order. What they should do however, is cordon off democratic areas and house them with those that insist this country owes the world a home. Especially the politicians, so we can see how generous they are without the theft of other peoples' paychecks. I'm sure they'd have no problem cleaning up after their guests
[–] 14859694? 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Its a misleading question from CNN as a headline from September 7th, that is changed into a even more misleading statement of a headline here. It is hard to outfake or go lower than CNN, but you managed to do just that.
[–] 14859755? [S] ago
https://sputniknews.com/military/201811031069485580-pentagon-refuses-trump-order-for-border-troops/