[–] e-socrates 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago (edited ago)
The usual "not peer reviewed" attack the messenger dosen't hold this time.
Quaternary International is peer reviewed. Gaslight climate alarmists will just employ the "ignore the messenger" gambit this go-round.
[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
It was because of all the exhaust coming from their horses!
[–] highvoltage13 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
While i think its important to reduce our collective footprint reasonably, liberals are acting like the worlds gonna blow up in two years. I mean Jesus, calm down and work with this "huge problem" you guys have instead of beating people over the head with it.
[–] ardvarcus 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
The Medieval Warm Period, by itself, contradicts the entire man-made global warming scenario. Which is why the warmists were so eager to discredit it and bury it. If it was warmer during Viking times than it is today, long before there was any industrial activity, why should we assume that any slight increase in temperature is caused by human activity? When we know for a fact that the world got warmer without human activity; and that this warming not only did no harm, but did an immense amount of good?
If you want to know why the entire man-made global warming hypothesis is a complete fraud, just study the Medieval Warm Period.
[–] GapingAnus 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The Medieval Warm Period, by itself, contradicts the entire man-made global warming scenario
I wouldn't say so by itself. Cause A having effect C does not mean cause B can't also cause C under different circumstances. Further, it's not a stretch to suggest that a massive outpouring of greenhouse gases will affect the climate. We know this happens after large volcanic events, for example.
The argument is one of quantity, not quality.
[–] Tasgall 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Yeah, the denialist argument is dumb because it hinges on the idea that climate changes naturally.
Like, no shit it changes over time, but that’s not literally the only cause.
It also doesn’t help their case that the current warming is off-cycle.
https://youtu.be/iDAuE6j9s6k this is why we are going trough a great awakening and we are reaching critical mass (100 monkey per say) so we are looking past all the BS that was fed to us
[–] Maroonsaint 6 points -1 points 5 points (+5|-6) ago (edited ago)
I like this cause it’ll just keeep getting worse and worse and worse and worse. Like a tv show that only improves. How bad can we make the weather? Stay tuned to find out.
[–] VapidGopher 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
Dems are suddenly like "wait we hate science because it's so fake"
[–] TheSeer 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Stop denying climate change, guys! Oh whats that, no one is denying the climate changes, but rather the theory of Anthromorphic Global Warming? My bad! Tougher to debunk someone's argument when you can't use a strawman... Hmmm... Back to the drawing board!
[–] Tasgall 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
Ah yes, the science of, “if A causes B, literally nothing else can ever cause B”. You don’t need to disprove the medieval warming period to show that it doesn’t disprove manmade global warming.
[–] VapidGopher 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I'm not arguing or agreeing with that, just pointing out that dems love science until it interferes with their agenda, then to them emotions become more powerful than logic and science. Don't get me going on the gender "debate" and complete abscence of science in their "gender consensus".
Also, what's up with all these 3+ year old accounts that are suddenly posting again? This is the 8th one this weekend that I've seen start posting within the past 2 days. Desperate last ditch effort from share blue? Budget cutbacks allow them to only start posting 2 days before midterms on here?