0
2

[–] CRKT_M16Z 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Be the Match gives a clear, well explained medical reason they need certain types of donors.

Fucktards completely fucking ignore it because of their feelings. That's the state of these fucktards. They literally don't give a shit about medical science.

Edit: Seems the fucktard responses have been deleted. They're no longer on there.

0
14

[–] obvious-throwaway- 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Wait until people figure out how fucked their race mixed kids are

0
4

[–] 7e62ce85 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

So so much white hate science. Just have a witch doctor dance around their sick bed and read some animal bones. That would be more diverse.

0
8

[–] Jungle_Jim 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Haha after a few replies, they just resorted to a copy/paste for these fucking idiots.

0
4

[–] MinorLeakage 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Hahaha Hahaha ha

1
2

[–] nrlftw 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

So the HLA argument they give isn’t legitimate?

0
20

[–] Octocopter 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

If they paid for it rather than just taking donations more non-whites would do it.

0
0

[–] Dalai_Llama ago 

Blood donaion is a for-profit industry.

Here is a list of transplant related billing codes.

I doubt anyone would assist in organ harvesting if there wasn't any money to be made. The donors are getting shafted out-right.

0
2

[–] Blacksdonttip 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

What would the market rate per pint of HIV+ and herpes tainted blood be? That's probably the best case scenario, though I guess it doesn't matter much since the recipient is likely infected too.

0
9

[–] carlip 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

this is a good idea. For instance, Medicad pays over $70,000 a year for people on kidney dialysis. The government could offer a program where people could sell a kidney for $50,000, paid by Medicad. Thus saving the tax payers $20,000 in the first year alone and $70,000 for every year the patient lives after the donation. The donor would then have $50,000 to spend which would right back into the economy.

0
0

[–] dangerous_ai ago  (edited ago)

Why should I sacrifice my own kidney for less than a single year of someone else's dialysis cost? I'm giving up my second kidney for the rest of my life. They're likely going to use it for longer than a year. No, sir. My kidneys are only for family members unless I'm a vegetable.

Edit: apparently, a kidney is worth about $260k on the black market. The 90% survival rate for a kidney transplant is 15 years. I figure the fair market value for a kidney is therefore somewhere between $260k and $2.5M, not $50k. Being a living kidney donor is not harmless, either. Incidence of mild renal failure, hypertension, proteinuria (protein in your urine) and cardiovascular disease is higher in living kidney donors.

1
8

[–] lustig1374 1 point 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

This seems like a good idea on paper, but it would lead to organ theft.

0
17

[–] MDE_ALWAYS_LIVES [S] 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

They'd just complain that the amount isn't high enough to pay their rent for eternity.

0
10

[–] Octocopter 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Or complain that the racist doctors don't want drug addicts who only wanted to get the cash to buy a rock.