1
-1

[–] Enigmius1 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I don't think attaching shame to this sort of thing is appropriate. This is one of those topics that boils down to "my preferences are more important than your liberties." It's a real shame, because it's just another one of those stupid topics that creates divisions in the community. Because we need more of that over stupid shit.

The gamers were the ones who spoke up and said they want more games, more indie games, more cheap games, but they still demand AAA performance. Having cake, eating too. Doesn't work.

0
0

[–] InfectedAI ago 

This is a ridiculous comment. It's not just preferences. 60 is objectively better. It looks better and results in smoother gameplay. How is this infringing on anyone's liberties in any way? That's ludicrous.

And 'AAA performance'? AAA does not have anything to do with this. You don't need a million dollar budget to hit 60 FPS. Don't lock your framerate arbitrarily, done. Some optimization wouldn't hurt either. Maybe you should understand the technicalities of game development a bit better before pulling the entitled gamers card.

0
0

[–] Enigmius1 ago 

It doesn't matter if "60 fps is objectively better." There are tons and tons of gamers who don't really care. You could argue that this engine is objectively better than that engine, and nobody is lining up to curate a Steam list of developers with the audacity to use a lesser engine.

I love how you talk about "some optimization wouldn't hurt" and in the same paragraph tell ME that I don't understand the technicalities of game design. Why don't you demonstrate your profound understanding by explaining what "some optimization" involves. (Hint: I know what it involves, because I've done it, so don't think some half-assed answer is going to fly, and don't think avoiding the question is going to work, either.)

0
1

[–] thebeatles518 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Can someone explain to me the hate for 30fps? Is it really that awful, or is it just bad after seeing 60 for most of your time? I ask because when I try to play something on my PC I'm lucky to get 10, 30 would be a dream.

0
0

[–] InfectedAI ago 

It's objectively bad. 30 FPS is less responsive and looks worse. PCs can handle running at 60 since there's no set hardware so arbitrary limits are ridiculous. The difference is even more jarring when you get used to 60 and play something locked to 30.

0
0

[–] thebeatles518 ago 

Ok, so why is there a 30fps cap? Not trying to argue, I'm genuinely not very computer savvy when it comes to FPS.

[–] [deleted] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] InfectedAI ago 

If you don't care that's fine, but there's nothing wrong with informing people about the framerate of the product they're purchasing.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] LordHumongus ago 

That's BS. Everyone knows you can't see the difference over 30 fps. /s

0
1

[–] stinkytaco 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

He needs to add MX vs ATV all 3 of their games have serious frame issues. The developers finally capped Reflex at 30FPS for multiplayer