0
0

[–] InfectedAI ago 

30 FPS is clearly inferior to 60. There is no argument against it. 60 looks smoother and results in more responsive controls. Claiming 30 FPS isn't a detriment is ridiculous. It's like trying to claim that watching a VHS is in no way inferior to watching a 1080p Blu-ray.

0
0

[–] LaconicSpecter ago  (edited ago)

Are you serious? It's absolutely a detriment. Nobody wins that way. I spent considerable money on my computer, there is no reason I shouldn't be able to use it. If you didn't, that's perfectly fine too. Set a cap yourself, use Vsync, whatever. A good game will give you these options. Don't enforce 30 fps for PC games ever. There is absolutely no reason to do so anymore.

0
0

[–] Bobfish_Almighty ago 

How?

All you've effectively said is "it's bad because I paid more money"

0
0

[–] LaconicSpecter ago 

No that's not what I've said and you know it. Quite conversely, you have failed to make a logically sound point while willfully ignoring mine.

Oh my goodness, it is bad because it is good for nobody. If your machine can't do 60 or whatever, then set your cap yourself. Say my machine can, why should I play the game at 30 fps? What advantage could there possibly be to that? There is none. That is not opinion, that is not subjective, it is math, numbers, fact.