[–] 14664640? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
actually, when looking for answers, it's exactly those "anomalies" in which we get people. Never does the suspect show up with a bloody knife in hand. Circumstantial evidence is just as important as evidence, they are weighted the same. Except by dumb people
[–] Are_we_sure 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago (edited ago)
I don't have a problem with circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence is not anomaly hunting. They are very different.
Circumstantial evidence is just as important as evidence
You can go even further and say it is evidence which it is.
I learned recently that circumstantial evidence is more expansive than I thought. If you wake up one morning and find snow all over the ground, that is circumstantial evidence it snowed, because you did not witness the fact it was snowing even if you did witness the snow on the ground. So circumstantial evidence can be quite strong evidence. (You could still be wrong to say it snowed. Perhaps they were making a movie on your block and used a snow machine to create snow.)
Back to the main question. The condition of the stickers on this guy's van is not circumstantial evidence that shows if this guy sent the bombs or not.
[–] Are_we_sure ago (edited ago)
I think the way it was used in the truth movement and Spare Change was intended as an anomaly. They posited it as odd that people didn't talk about WTC 7 collapsing. That was not unusual at all. Because by that time of day a lot of people stopping paying attention to the news. I know I shut off the TV to be with friends and family. Bars and restaurants were unusually packed that night in NYC, by the way. Seems everyone wanted to be with people.
And since most folks didn't know much about WTC 7 Spare Change could set the terms of the debate. You couldn't answer all the questions they were asking without looking into it, so the movie could catch you off guard, especially when it distorted the facts.
Once you look into WTC 7 and understand what went on, there's nothing really anomalous about WTC 7.
First off, many other buildings were destroyed that day and there were other structural collapses. "Half of WTC 4 and most of the central part of WTC 6 suffered collapse on all floors." WTC 5 which suffered a massive fire-induced collapse of its upper floors that day. Fires caused columns to buckle within WTC 5. These were partial collapses and not a full progressive collapse. One reason for that might be these were 8 and 9 story buildings and thus much, much smaller than WTC 7. So they didn't have the weight of all the upper floors bearing down which might have turned these partial collapses into full progressive collapses.
Two areas in WTC 5 experienced local collapse under an intact portion of the roof. Although there was debris impact near this area, the symmetrical nature of the collapse strongly suggests that the failures were due to the uncontrolled fires. This is supported by the observation that the columns in this area remained straight and freestanding (see Figure 4-18). This local collapse appeared to have begun at the field connection where beams were connected to shop-fabricated beam stubs and column assemblies as illustrated in Figures 4-19, 4-20, and 4-21.
The structural collapse appeared to be due to a combination of excessive shear loads on bolted connections and unanticipated tensile forces resulting from catenary sagging of the beams. The existence of high shear loads, likely due to collapsing floor loads from above, was evident in many of the column-tree beam stub cantilevers that formed diagonal tension field mechanisms in the cantilever webs and plastic moments at the column, as seen in Figure 4-18. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/WTC_ch4.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/fig-4-18.jpg
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/fig-4-19.jpg
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/fig-4-20.jpg
[–] qintel4u [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
@Are_we_sure The man has aliases. At least try as keep up. Nobody ever uses fake accounts or pushes memes with NPC accounts. Nothing real in our virtual world. Cesar Altieri Randazzo - If it was him Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/cesar.a.randazzo?lst=100000838646971%3A100001487329184%3A1540573659 His Twitter account is Cesar Altieri - https://twitter.com/hardrock2016 If it was him....
Now you get the idea?
[–] Are_we__sure 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
Not at all. That facebook page seems to be down, btw. What does his using aliases have to do with whether or anamoly hunting is a valid way to investigate?
[–] Mcdrogon 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
It’s a good way to determine if we are being fed bullshit. Not only are we trying to dig on this guy, but also the material evidence we have. In this case, the van, the graphics, the “bombs” that were never meant to explode, the logistics of delivering these packages and have them arrive at the same time or day to several different addresses, the overall enviroment and timing of this. We know the DS is not above doing whatever it takes to control the narrative and keep power. FFS, look what they tried with Kavenaugh less than a month ago. Consider all the other FF’s over the last couple of years. The DS is in panic mode. The ‘caravan’ isn’t helping the Dem’s in the midterms, another Conservative SC justice was confirmed, the economy is going well, minorities are leaving the dems... We should be looking into this guy and motive but we can’t ignore the clues that this is BS. I am shocked that one of these packages wasn’t actually live. Stay vigilant patriot.
[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
AWS is a world-class troll.