[–] qintel4u [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
@Are_we_sure The man has aliases. At least try as keep up. Nobody ever uses fake accounts or pushes memes with NPC accounts. Nothing real in our virtual world. Cesar Altieri Randazzo - If it was him Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/cesar.a.randazzo?lst=100000838646971%3A100001487329184%3A1540573659 His Twitter account is Cesar Altieri - https://twitter.com/hardrock2016 If it was him....
Now you get the idea?
[–] Are_we__sure 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
Not at all. That facebook page seems to be down, btw. What does his using aliases have to do with whether or anamoly hunting is a valid way to investigate?
[–] Mcdrogon 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
It’s a good way to determine if we are being fed bullshit. Not only are we trying to dig on this guy, but also the material evidence we have. In this case, the van, the graphics, the “bombs” that were never meant to explode, the logistics of delivering these packages and have them arrive at the same time or day to several different addresses, the overall enviroment and timing of this. We know the DS is not above doing whatever it takes to control the narrative and keep power. FFS, look what they tried with Kavenaugh less than a month ago. Consider all the other FF’s over the last couple of years. The DS is in panic mode. The ‘caravan’ isn’t helping the Dem’s in the midterms, another Conservative SC justice was confirmed, the economy is going well, minorities are leaving the dems... We should be looking into this guy and motive but we can’t ignore the clues that this is BS. I am shocked that one of these packages wasn’t actually live. Stay vigilant patriot.
[–] Universal_Management 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Also his twittter account sure does smell of lunacy, manufactured or not. Posting the same thing over and over again on the same days? Sometimes several days in a row in the past few months.
[–] WhiteRonin 1 point 6 points 7 points (+7|-1) ago
Anamoly hunting is used to verify or discredit evidence.
[–] Are_we__sure 4 points -3 points 1 point (+1|-4) ago
Anomaly hunting is used to shift the frame of the debate.
What is the question we are trying to answer. Did the FBI get the right guy? Did this guy send the bombs? Those seem to be the big picture questions.
Instead the question is shifted to How come this guys stickers aren't faded in the Florida sun? As if that answers the question of is this the guy. The conditions of his stickers don't answer that question whatsoever.
It's a way of handling the cognitive dissonance of this guy seems to a big Trump supporter like me or this guy uses some of the same memes I use. Rather than examine what that means, let's shift it to measuring stickers in sunlight.
[–] WhiteRonin 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I can see your point but consider that new stickers versus faded one are a way of showing that the evidence isn’t lining up and thus why I commented.
Sure some people are looking at details but in general it’s just to prove this is crap.
[–] 14664640? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
actually, when looking for answers, it's exactly those "anomalies" in which we get people. Never does the suspect show up with a bloody knife in hand. Circumstantial evidence is just as important as evidence, they are weighted the same. Except by dumb people
[–] Are_we_sure 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago (edited ago)
I don't have a problem with circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence is not anomaly hunting. They are very different.
You can go even further and say it is evidence which it is.
I learned recently that circumstantial evidence is more expansive than I thought. If you wake up one morning and find snow all over the ground, that is circumstantial evidence it snowed, because you did not witness the fact it was snowing even if you did witness the snow on the ground. So circumstantial evidence can be quite strong evidence. (You could still be wrong to say it snowed. Perhaps they were making a movie on your block and used a snow machine to create snow.)
Back to the main question. The condition of the stickers on this guy's van is not circumstantial evidence that shows if this guy sent the bombs or not.