[–] edgelord666 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
do you have a college degree? be honest
[–] shrink 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Two of them from a top 25 university.
Funny enough that university tanked in rankings after my class left because it's run by a power tripping autocratic niggress who is a black version of Hillary Clinton. Also, remember that John McCain memorial in Vietnam you swore was a blatant lie? I know your account only exists to troll but I still enjoy rubbing that shit in your face.
[–] sn00tyfr00T 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Based upon the size of the invasion, the more accurate term would be a division. Literally, a division of illegal alien invaders. And there are tens if not hundreds of thousands more where that came from
[–] TeddyJackson 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
or influence our elections.
This is why "Reagan", aka Bush Sr., created amnesty. The country was so republican they needed new browns/democrats to vote otherwise their charade of a (((two party system))) would be ruined. 1992 was also the last year there was a third party in the main presidential debates.
[–] Crazyjoe33 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago (edited ago)
The entire concept of the "two party" system confounds me. I get that it's a tool for dividing us up, but it's crazy at how ferocious people can get over which side is better, no matter what. Like football on steroids.
[–] EyeOfHorus 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Because the debate is a private debate owned by the Dems and Reps. The league of women voters no longer arranges the debate. The system is fixed.
[–] R34p_Th3_Wh0r1w1nd ago
I've been using, "Invasion force".