0
0

[–] 14601667? [S] ago 

Its concern trolling basically. Very subtle, but concern trolling non the less. We need to keep the excitement high, anything that even suggests that the opposition is in the lead is hogwash. Just what you said, in 2016, NY Times had Hillary at 92% chance of winning, pure horseshit, and we proved it. They should be cheerleading for us, not concern fagging.

0
0

[–] 14602657? ago 

But if their goal is to increase voter turn out, then cheerleading for us appears to have the opposite reaction. Especially in a Mid-term where people tend to be complacent. Besides, it will be much more fun when the Left-wing media and their brainwashed sheep get blindsided again. Can't wait for the devastated crying and screaming, but for those deep in blue territory, be vigilant for riots.

0
0

[–] 14609353? [S] ago  (edited ago)

As Q has stated, the media is pushing bogus numbers and only showing their tiny "uprisings". There are far more of us than them, all we have to do is sow up at the ballot box to win back our country, fair and square, with a minimum of violence. Q knows we can do it, that's the plan. He gives us a fair election, I hope, but we have to show up to do our part. The media is rigged, its 100% against us, but if we win this election, we can fix that shit, same with social media.

0
0

[–] 14594946? ago 

It's an old debate: does bad news for your "crowd" motivate you to vote in defiance, or does it demotivate you, because you feel like it is useless? There are people in both categories of personality, on both sides of the aisle.
In the end, fuck all that, just go out and vote for what you believe is the best.