Sure, but I can assure you we don’t have shield maiden caliber serving right now. Shit a Bitch gets knocked up and has like 6 months off then another limited duty chit if she wants it. It’s a crock of shit. Trust me I would know.
during the same eras though if you were a hazzard to your unit they would have killed you and went on with their day thinking nothing of it. Maybe they would have waited for a battle and said the other side did it maybe not, but you were not going to be protected if your being there risked the lives of the others. There will always be exceptions to any rule so saying but this one time will always be true, but often not important. It was a mistake on obvious's part to word the title the way he did where one exception disproves it all. "no ____ in the history of time" statements will nearly all turn out to be false. Even in this example it started with "No army in the history of time has been afraid of fags and broads." Then turned into needing to be "entire armies". In two posts I figured out no point in discussing this with him as crudomatic pointed out he will just move the goalpost.
What you are trying to say is that past militaries have included fags and women and that other militaries were afraid of them. What I am trying to say is that the fags and women in the military aren't what the opposing army fears, which is correct.
Since you are trying to nitpick, just send me a historical event where an opposing military said, "oh FUCK, that army there has a lot of women and fags, we better watch the fuck out!" fellow soldier, "yeah, but what about the men?" ... "oh, we have nothing to fear from the men, it's the women and fags that we are terrified of." This has never happened, ever. That was my point and you know it.
[–] reichnarok 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Sure, but I can assure you we don’t have shield maiden caliber serving right now. Shit a Bitch gets knocked up and has like 6 months off then another limited duty chit if she wants it. It’s a crock of shit. Trust me I would know.
[–] Thrus2 ago
during the same eras though if you were a hazzard to your unit they would have killed you and went on with their day thinking nothing of it. Maybe they would have waited for a battle and said the other side did it maybe not, but you were not going to be protected if your being there risked the lives of the others. There will always be exceptions to any rule so saying but this one time will always be true, but often not important. It was a mistake on obvious's part to word the title the way he did where one exception disproves it all. "no ____ in the history of time" statements will nearly all turn out to be false. Even in this example it started with "No army in the history of time has been afraid of fags and broads." Then turned into needing to be "entire armies". In two posts I figured out no point in discussing this with him as crudomatic pointed out he will just move the goalpost.
[–] obvious-throwaway- [S] ago
What you are trying to say is that past militaries have included fags and women and that other militaries were afraid of them. What I am trying to say is that the fags and women in the military aren't what the opposing army fears, which is correct.
Since you are trying to nitpick, just send me a historical event where an opposing military said, "oh FUCK, that army there has a lot of women and fags, we better watch the fuck out!" fellow soldier, "yeah, but what about the men?" ... "oh, we have nothing to fear from the men, it's the women and fags that we are terrified of." This has never happened, ever. That was my point and you know it.