[–] PatriotAnon123 ago
Breitbart was a CIA hit! They couldn't care less if they have authority or not! Obama worked for them, and still does, for that matter!!!
[–] Meme_Factory_1776 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago (edited ago)
Not me. I was goona leave e this shit hole if hrc got in. To the hills of Argentina.
[–] JohnLocke1776 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I couldn't do that and live with myself. All my ancestors worked hard, fought to make this collection of British colonies into a nation, fought the democrat southern states with some never coming home and nearly every war since. We have a small family cemetery next to my great grandfather's log home on the land of his great-great grandfather's. The first to settle on the frontier had to sleep at the fort some miles away every night. Each morning they never knew if all of their work went up in flames or not. They scratched out a living and here I am. I understand the duty of stewardship.
[–] PatriotAnon123 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The difference between Obama and HRC is that most of her enemies were arkancided, i.e., committed suicide by shooting themselves in the back of the head twice, or decided to take themselves out and their whole families with them!!! What is the world coming to when assassinations almost qualify as the lesser of two evils?
[–] crazy_eyes 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
And the press is always all over Putin for shit like this
[–] PatriotAnon123 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
They were upset from the moment when he first started to drain his swamp!
[–] Are_we_sure 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Your analysis is puerile and facile and dishonest. It's not a hit list at all and it doesn't apply to American citizens. It only applies to
The document is actually a serious attempt wrestle with a very serious issue: what do you do when an American leads a stateless terror group like Al Qaida and is seriously threatening the US and is beyond the reach of US law. It's an attempt to construct a moral and legal framework around the drone program and the threat of terrorists operating in fiefdoms or failed states. It's actually an attempt to place limits on drone warfare and ensure it follows the laws of war.
In fact the document is titled
This does not apply to American citizens in general.
and the US has to keep monitoring to see this changes and they can be captured. This can't happen in the US and only applies to war zones and failed states and terrorist fiefdoms
Here's what the document says
Here the Department of Justice concludes only that where the following three conditions are met, a U.S. operation using lethal force in a foreign country against a U.S. citizen who is a senior operational leader of al-Qa'ida or an associated force would be lawful: (1) an informed, high-level official of the U.S. government has determined that the targeted individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States; (2) capture is infeasible, and the United States continues to monitor whether capture becomes feasible; and (3) the operation would be conducted in a manner consistent with applicable law of war principles. This conclusion is reached with recognition of the extraordinary seriousness of a lethal operation by the United States against a U.S. citizen, and also of the extraordinary seriousness of the threat posed by senior operational al Qa'ida members and the loss of life that would result were their operations successful.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/74/020413_DOJ_White_Paper.pdf
I don't consider killing a terrorist who poses active threat to the US because they can't be arrested to evil and who has joined a group that has declared war on America and I'm sure a lot of other folks agree with that.
You can debate the morality/ethics/limitations of this policy, but ignoring the complexities of the problem it is trying to address is morally dishonest.
[–] kestrel9 0 points 11 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago
Re: Obama …the saying 'Show me who your friends are and I'll show you who you are' applies quite well
Who helped Obama get elected via his book of lies?
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/bill-ayers-unrepentant-lying-terrorist-andrew-c-mccarthy/
and this: (keep in mind that today, the term 'people we can't reeducate' are called 'deplorables'. That's why they have no issue discussing genocide for patriots who they lump together and make it sound less literal: i.e. 'killing whiteness' as if they wouldn't kill Americans of any color to get their way.
We're supposed to take these domestic terrorists word that they wouldn't do it if they had a chance? Why are they promoting mob violence and then denying it? These radical Dems may have nice clothes, nice jobs and say what some people want to hear, but they didn't flinch at the opportunity to shred the presumption of innocence to suit their political purposes. They don't care if violence escalates, they've probably been hoping and praying for mass violence to erupt for some time now, just to cover up the obscene corruption they've instituted, stealing from the people and selling out the country as if it belongs to them.
[–] MykaLove 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Great post!