0
11

[–] kestrel9 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Re: Obama …the saying 'Show me who your friends are and I'll show you who you are' applies quite well

Who helped Obama get elected via his book of lies?

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/bill-ayers-unrepentant-lying-terrorist-andrew-c-mccarthy/

and this: (keep in mind that today, the term 'people we can't reeducate' are called 'deplorables'. That's why they have no issue discussing genocide for patriots who they lump together and make it sound less literal: i.e. 'killing whiteness' as if they wouldn't kill Americans of any color to get their way.

The Weathermen actually believed that they would be successful in overthrowing the U.S. government and that, with the help of the Cubans, Chinese, Russians, and North Vietnamese, they would occupy America. https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/2455-obamas-friend-ayers-kill-25-million-americans

I asked, "Well what is going to happen to those people we can't reeducate, that are diehard capitalists?" And the reply was that they'd have to be eliminated.

And when I pursued this further, they estimated they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these reeducation centers.

And when I say "eliminate," I mean "kill."

Twenty-five million people.

I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of which have graduate degrees, from Columbia and other well-known educational centers, and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people and they were dead serious.

We're supposed to take these domestic terrorists word that they wouldn't do it if they had a chance? Why are they promoting mob violence and then denying it? These radical Dems may have nice clothes, nice jobs and say what some people want to hear, but they didn't flinch at the opportunity to shred the presumption of innocence to suit their political purposes. They don't care if violence escalates, they've probably been hoping and praying for mass violence to erupt for some time now, just to cover up the obscene corruption they've instituted, stealing from the people and selling out the country as if it belongs to them.

0
1

[–] MykaLove 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Great post!

0
7

[–] MykaLove 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Sad to say but Scalia under my Tin Hat was murdered -- Lynch was suppose to take his place. Wouldn't be surprised if Breitbart was taken out by him too.

0
1

[–] HistoryQuest 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Agreed, on both counts.

0
0

[–] PatriotAnon123 ago 

Breitbart was a CIA hit! They couldn't care less if they have authority or not! Obama worked for them, and still does, for that matter!!!

0
7

[–] swimkin 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I believe there were many Patriot Americans on his list and would have been sent to FEMA camps or murdered once HRC got into office.

2
0

[–] Meme_Factory_1776 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Not me. I was goona leave e this shit hole if hrc got in. To the hills of Argentina.

0
1

[–] JohnLocke1776 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I couldn't do that and live with myself. All my ancestors worked hard, fought to make this collection of British colonies into a nation, fought the democrat southern states with some never coming home and nearly every war since. We have a small family cemetery next to my great grandfather's log home on the land of his great-great grandfather's. The first to settle on the frontier had to sleep at the fort some miles away every night. Each morning they never knew if all of their work went up in flames or not. They scratched out a living and here I am. I understand the duty of stewardship.

0
4

[–] Keneo77 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Between HRC and him, a small city was probably executed.

0
4

[–] mlsaw94 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

So is this America we live in? What the heck? And it’s just come out and yet no one can get past the courts and lawyers?! Oh, I just can’t get my mind around this at all even though Obama makes me sick, this is unbelievable!!

0
0

[–] Michael3500BC ago 

Welcome to the real world.

0
1

[–] PatriotAnon123 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The difference between Obama and HRC is that most of her enemies were arkancided, i.e., committed suicide by shooting themselves in the back of the head twice, or decided to take themselves out and their whole families with them!!! What is the world coming to when assassinations almost qualify as the lesser of two evils?

0
3

[–] crazy_eyes 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

And the press is always all over Putin for shit like this

0
1

[–] PatriotAnon123 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

They were upset from the moment when he first started to drain his swamp!

0
2

[–] Qdog 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Yes he is. But his name IS NOT Obama. He wants to change his name again. He is applying for PINDAR. (Satan's Dick)

1
-1

[–] Are_we_sure 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Your analysis is puerile and facile and dishonest. It's not a hit list at all and it doesn't apply to American citizens. It only applies to

U.S. Citizens who are Senior Operational Leaders of Al Qa’ida or An Associated Force

The document is actually a serious attempt wrestle with a very serious issue: what do you do when an American leads a stateless terror group like Al Qaida and is seriously threatening the US and is beyond the reach of US law. It's an attempt to construct a moral and legal framework around the drone program and the threat of terrorists operating in fiefdoms or failed states. It's actually an attempt to place limits on drone warfare and ensure it follows the laws of war.

In fact the document is titled

Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a U.S. Citizen who is a Senior Operational Leader of Al Qa’ida or An Associated Force.”

This does not apply to American citizens in general.

This only applies to

U.S. citizens who is a senior operational leader of al-Qa'ida or an associated force

who pose an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States

whose capture is infeasible

and the US has to keep monitoring to see this changes and they can be captured. This can't happen in the US and only applies to war zones and failed states and terrorist fiefdoms

and the operation must be within the laws of war.

Here's what the document says

Here the Department of Justice concludes only that where the following three conditions are met, a U.S. operation using lethal force in a foreign country against a U.S. citizen who is a senior operational leader of al-Qa'ida or an associated force would be lawful: (1) an informed, high-level official of the U.S. government has determined that the targeted individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States; (2) capture is infeasible, and the United States continues to monitor whether capture becomes feasible; and (3) the operation would be conducted in a manner consistent with applicable law of war principles. This conclusion is reached with recognition of the extraordinary seriousness of a lethal operation by the United States against a U.S. citizen, and also of the extraordinary seriousness of the threat posed by senior operational al Qa'ida members and the loss of life that would result were their operations successful.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/74/020413_DOJ_White_Paper.pdf

I don't consider killing a terrorist who poses active threat to the US because they can't be arrested to evil and who has joined a group that has declared war on America and I'm sure a lot of other folks agree with that.

You can debate the morality/ethics/limitations of this policy, but ignoring the complexities of the problem it is trying to address is morally dishonest.

0
0

[–] BelleDJour ago 

FFFFFFFFFFFFuking Marxist bitch

load more comments ▼ (9 remaining)