0
1

[–] GodsAngell 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

There is evidence that the No. CA fires were deliberately set to make way for a Santa Rosa City Urban Renewal Project which the city approved June 2017. The plans called for demolition of single family homes and replace with multiple family homes and businesses. Coincidence?

Is it a coincidence that the exact same areas designated for demolition by the city, actually got demolished by these fires?

NEXT: There is evidence that the fires were too hot for just a normal forest fire. All metal and glass melted in these fires of the homes alone, while the landscaping remained untouched (trees/shrubs). This is not normal for a "forest fire". Evidence that DEW's used to target these homes specifically. (DEWs = Directed Energy Weapons....laser technology).

NOW: City of Santa Rosa is REQUIRING rapid destruction of the remaining Foundations by the Army Corp of Engineers TO DESTROY THE EVIDENCE THAT DEWs Were Used! You must get an injunction to stop this immediately!

No normal fire:

forbiddenknowledgetv.net/california-fires-and-directed-energy/

youtube.com/watch?v=Q2q7nN0JYWE& lc=z22pub140qbfcdwcnacdp43bevq2zctiizwxdq51htpw03c010c

At 12 minute mark photo of City of Santa Rosa, CA plans for urban renewal project, APPROVED June 2017:

youtube.com/watch?v=fQy5CDDzhoc

Fire Fighters say this is no normal fire. Looked like bomb went off:

sfgate.com/local/article/Watch-as-Berkeley-firefighters-arrived-in-Santa-12279786.php

Army Corp of Engineers coming in TO DESTROY EVIDENCE that DEWs were used:

latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-santa-rosa-future-20171024-story.html

City of Santa Rosa Planning & Development:

srcity.org/354/Planning-Division

Video: (7 mins):

Cellphone Video of Giant Laser in NorCal Fire

https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/cellphone-video-of-giant-laser-in-norcal-fire/

0
1

[–] Cleanhobo 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Meh... Fire is hot. I have seen pumice soil turned to glass after wild-fires. Did Santa Rosa touch off a few areas to clear the way and get free funding for their pet project... DEFINITELY. DEFINITELY they would do that. Does it require a deeply illegal space weapon to start stuff on fire in Cali in August? Nope.. Just a mexican with a can of gas and a book of matches... really. You can level any place in California with that. Like adding another 1000 degrees would make a difference... Nope. YOu are looking at scorched earth either way. But fuck it... Lets talk about Satellites on orbit... This IS SOMETHING I KNOW A FEW THINGS ABOUT... So you know... I am not talking out of my ass.... I was a satellite controller in Colorado Springs. I flew GEO comm satellites and near polar imaging constellations as well. One of the most difficult things to manage on a Satellite is POWER. Pretty much the whole thing is built like a Prius. Power conservation at all expenses... So think about how much raw energy would be needed to make a space weapon that could light a camp-fire let alone a forest fire through miles and miles of atomosphere... This thing MUST be nuclear powered or use an exotic technology like LENR or ZPE. Nothing else would provide enough power to get the job done. Nuclear is out of the quesiton. If you build a nuclear one it woudl have an advanced and tiny propultion system. This would be a prize to any nation with a space capability... They would just send up a shuttle and capture it. simple as that. Don't think that doesn't happen because it does. Same if it had exotic tech. It would be captured. See this is the problem with secrets. You can't really USE them because its obvious and if you DO use it then it can be stolen and you can't bitch because it doesn't exist right? Right. Anyway.. There are DEW systems that were made at Kirtland AFB in the late 90s and early 2000s that will fit on a plane. That system could start a wild-fire but again... WHY ?? WHY TAKE THE RISK...??? LIterally a mexican with a can of gas and a book of matches will have the same effect.

0
0

[–] robertawearefree ago 

I live in PNW. Never been this hot and dry year after year. Not lack of logging (how would we have had billions of acres of old growth in the first place?) but, rather, lack of rain and too hot weather.

0
0

[–] Cleanhobo ago 

look at the tree rings on those old growth trees... compare the thickness of tree rings to previous ones... If you follow this long enough you will see dry and wet patterns. There It IS hot and dry in the PNW but not insanely so. Old Growth forests are VERY fire resistant. They can burn but it takes pretty extreme conditions. Its the second growth that will burn like crazy, which is part of the sucession that eventually leads to an old growth forest. We have mostly 2nd growth and reprod in the PNW now. This means that we can suffer fires for the next 200 years along with tremendous expense trying to accelerate the recreation of old growth forests while we all starve and go broke or we can continue a logging industry that was killed in the 80s to save spotted owls.

0
1

[–] robertawearefree 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

So the problem, then, is that we no longer have any old growth forests. Due to logging. Your point then is that, having gotten to this place by clear-cutting, we need to continue doing what we have been doing?