[–] MrShekelstein 0 points 23 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago (edited ago)
In case people don't realize WHY they are going for rifles first instead of handguns I will explain it again.
It's because if the jew controlled police start knocking on peoples doors and searching houses, your neighbor can simply shoot the pigs down from almost a mile away if necessary.
It makes it almost impossible to enact a police state.
[–] perro_negro 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Explains why it seems everyone is ignoring shotguns. They are really deadly up close and don't require that much training. Yet it's always about rifles.
[–] Feces_the_clown 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
They haven't gotten to them. Yet.
[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Because shotguns cant shot a 30 caliber clip in half a second
[–] chuckletrousers 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
from almost a mile away.
wat
[–] TigerCatcher 0 points 15 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago
It can shoot down a plane and penetrate police body armor. Sounds like just what our founders intended us to have - the means to defend ourselves from the government if necessary
[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
I hate the Musket argument, when I explain that Muskets were the bees knees back then and that military and people were just about equaly armed in those times aka way heavier than today I get blank stares and then the reeeing starts.
[–] firedak 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
also that civilians owned cannons....
I mean, you can still own a black powder cannon and not need a tax stamp, but back then when the biggest weapons were cannons, and anyone who wanted to and had the money could own a cannon, it would be like owning a missile today.
[–] ShitPostMcGee 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Speaking of body armor, the founders would probably want the people to have some too, but for some reason it is illegal to bullet-proof one's torso in this day.
Edit: Nevermind I am a dumbass
[–] superspathi 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
There's been at least one attempt to outlaw ballistic armor for civilians, but it failed obviously.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 11 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] [deleted] 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
[–] NakedWarrior 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
When anti-gun people ask you why you need an AR-15, turn the question around on them and ask them why they drive a Mercedes instead of a Honda (or whatever car model fits). It usually shuts them up.
[–] superspathi 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I think I'd say "Because it's good for killing large numbers of people in combat."
[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
What you are expecting from people who say that banning 30 round "clips" is good on the long run because once the gun nuts shot the 30 rounders only the small 10 rounders will be left.
[–] ProgNaziGator 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago (edited ago)
Let's take UK, after they get ALL the guns within two decades you are at this point:
http://www.activistpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ban-plastic-knives1.jpg
And
http://www.reoiv.com/images/random/UK_Knife_Laws_Suck.jpg
Then this:
http://knifenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/UK-Knives.jpg
Of course their real target is self defense.
Disageee? See it it doesnt stop at guns and knives.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/jan/20/appeal-court-frees-man-burglar-attack
I can't find a link for the old man who got arrested with nail clippers.
[–] CuriosityOnFire 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
ONLY FIST RULES NOW. WOMEN SUBMIT.
ALLAH AKHBAR INFIDEL BITCHES !
[–] IheartSwimming 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
inb4: Muskets are cannons and nobody(but the government) needs that kind of firepower.
[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
While you were writting this sentence a bunch of gangbanges shot eachother in Chicago, but you won't hear about that.
[–] nubbyhubby 0 points 26 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago
Truth! The left hates that we can own Guns legally.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 23 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago
[–] Humansized 1 point 14 points 15 points (+15|-1) ago
Ive seen enough anime to know all asians either know martial arts or have super powers, thats the real reason they dont have guns.
[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
And Japan will considering locking the country up again after 2020.
Calling it now, number of rapes will spike when Olyimpics start and drop just as fast after.
The Jap residence near US bases know.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] DiscontentedMajority 1 point 9 points 10 points (+10|-1) ago
Surprisingly, gun ownership is actually pretty even across left and right. The left are just hypocrites
[–] chuckletrousers 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
But the niggers guns aren't registered.
[–] nubbyhubby 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Regardless the Democrat leadership will try and abolish gun rights! So anyone that loves the 2nd amendment and votes for the Dems is "suicidal".
[–] perro_negro 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
It's the young ones coming out of colleges and universities that are scary brainwashed. Thank God for generation Z, I don't think we could withstand two or three more generations like those idiots.