[–] Thrus2 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Well if you bow hunt you are much lower on the list, at least until they figure out how hard it is to find a bow being shot vs an arrow as well as that bullet proof does not mean cut proof so an arrow my be a totally different ball game for basic protection (some are both).
[–] [deleted] 0 points 11 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] captainstrange 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Theres a reason why congress and senators are going to come after bolt actions specifically.
They're less of an issue than ARs.
Also, in a shooting war, ammo will become scarce, regardless of how much "stockpiling" americans have done.
Patriots will resort to bolt-actions because the damage per round is higher, and distance plus concealment are a good tradeoff versus the fully automatic weapons common to military and police departments.
They will come after bolt-action rifles because without them, hit and run tactics will be more expensive and have to be conducted in close quarters for smaller forces to be effective.
And in the process they'll follow with "well ARs are really like bolt-action sniper rifles too!"
And the rest will be history.
[–] captainstrange 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Thanks, what I should have wrote was "ammo efficiency."
One shot versus full auto.
[–] shitstartercarter 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I've shot one of those in 7mm Remington Magnum, sure as shit would take down anything coming your way. I liked it even though it was a Remington. Remington has been making some shotty firearms in its recent history.
[–] MrShekelstein 0 points 23 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago (edited ago)
In case people don't realize WHY they are going for rifles first instead of handguns I will explain it again.
It's because if the jew controlled police start knocking on peoples doors and searching houses, your neighbor can simply shoot the pigs down from almost a mile away if necessary.
It makes it almost impossible to enact a police state.
[–] perro_negro 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Explains why it seems everyone is ignoring shotguns. They are really deadly up close and don't require that much training. Yet it's always about rifles.
[–] Feces_the_clown 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
They haven't gotten to them. Yet.
[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Because shotguns cant shot a 30 caliber clip in half a second
[–] chuckletrousers 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
wat
[–] [deleted] 0 points 13 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago