1
2

[–] kontiki 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

They can say whatever they want and come for whatever guns they want. I don't care.

They're just not gonna get them though.

0
2

[–] 123456788 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

If they take deer hunting away from me, all hell is going to break loose.

0
3

[–] NancyNY2 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I agree, it's all we eat. I love living off the land.

I don"t think this will end well and will be one hell of a civil war.

0
3

[–] Thrus2 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Well if you bow hunt you are much lower on the list, at least until they figure out how hard it is to find a bow being shot vs an arrow as well as that bullet proof does not mean cut proof so an arrow my be a totally different ball game for basic protection (some are both).

0
2

[–] captainstrange 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Theres a reason why congress and senators are going to come after bolt actions specifically.

They're less of an issue than ARs.

Also, in a shooting war, ammo will become scarce, regardless of how much "stockpiling" americans have done.

Patriots will resort to bolt-actions because the damage per round is higher, and distance plus concealment are a good tradeoff versus the fully automatic weapons common to military and police departments.

They will come after bolt-action rifles because without them, hit and run tactics will be more expensive and have to be conducted in close quarters for smaller forces to be effective.

And in the process they'll follow with "well ARs are really like bolt-action sniper rifles too!"

And the rest will be history.

0
3

[–] Thrus2 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Bolt or semi-auto doesn't change the damage capabilities of the round fired they do not change range either. The type of ammo and way they are used changes those.

0
1

[–] captainstrange 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Thanks, what I should have wrote was "ammo efficiency."

One shot versus full auto.

0
2

[–] BernieT 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Unfortunately for the libtards, it is a sniper rifle. Oh well, going to need more liberals.

0
3

[–] American-Patriot 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

This is why you never agree to any anti-gun law. Because all guns are assault weapons.

0
4

[–] spaceman84 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The 223 is already considered "high powered" by the lying kike media. Just wait till they can whine about how much more powerful 308 and 6.5 are and how much farther away they can murder children. They want you to only have access to pistols that can't penetrate kevlar.

0
4

[–] ShitPostMcGee 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The left says people should be safe from guns.

They also say people should not own body armor.

0
4

[–] 14499954? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

what is that, it’s a very cool gun.

1
1

[–] curomo 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Looks like a Ruger 10/22, only going by the mag well though.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] shitstartercarter 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I've shot one of those in 7mm Remington Magnum, sure as shit would take down anything coming your way. I liked it even though it was a Remington. Remington has been making some shotty firearms in its recent history.

0
1

[–] DaveofPC 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I'll stick with my Weatherby 300 Magnum. Don't even have to gut them, it does it for you. Lol

0
7

[–] Battlefat 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

It’s a Remington 700 varmint rifle

0
9

[–] Gadsden 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Those damn Washington varmints.

load more comments ▼ (9 remaining)