[–] mattsixteen24 [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
None of them say bible alone. Again, show me one verse that teaches bible alone. Don't give 10 verses. Show me one verse or passage that teaches your bible alone belief.
Here are couple verses that disprove your protestant beliefs.
This verse clearly states both oral and written.
[14] Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle. [2 Thessalonians 2:14]
No private interpretation of scripture.
[20] Understanding this first, that no prophecy of scripture is made by private interpretation. [2 Peter 1:20]
[–] sguevar 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Your transgressions are despicable, but I will indulge you:
There is an enormous difference in your version. "called you by our gospel" - oral action of evangelizing by the Word of God. "to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ" To gain the salvation through the Lord Jesus Christ. Your false doctrine is appalling.
Taking a passage out of context - you didn't end the quote with verse 21: "For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost." Which means that no man can interpret the Word of God without the inspiration and enlightenment of the Holy Ghost.
The Catholic church a private enterprise managed by the will of man not by the Word of God, nor by Jesus our Lord is the Whore of the Revelations.
[–] mattsixteen24 [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
vs
Where is the huge difference?
If you go to the next verses of St. Peter in Chapter 2 verses 1-10. He talks about false teachers. "sects of perdition" which is in line with private interpretation.
The Douay-Rheims came before the KJV. Protestants even attack the Douay Rheims in the preface of the KJV. Plus the protestant bible leaves out 7 books.
You still haven't provided a verse that teaches bible alone.