[–] ForTheUltimate 2 points 12 points 14 points (+14|-2) ago
they won't rise up illegally
they'll rise up legally and you won;t do shit
[–] [deleted] 4 points -2 points 2 points (+2|-4) ago
[–] spaceman84 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Won't be leftists, but their nigger army
[–] juicedidwtc 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
yea i highly doubt we have to worry about this anymore
[–] notyouraveragellama 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Jesus, Pepe must be rich. Ammo that much ammo would be fucking expensive.
[–] englishwebster 2 points 13 points 15 points (+15|-2) ago
this is textbook gaslighting. someone on voat isnt our friend.
[–] [deleted] 2 points 4 points 6 points (+6|-2) ago
[–] englishwebster 6 points -1 points 5 points (+5|-6) ago
not at all. simply that encouraging violence is best left for hillary clinton and her ilk from a pure optics point of view.
were here to win an election
[–] I_AM_POTATO 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
How is this gaslighting? Granted the google definition of gaslighting makes no sense to me. Especially on how it's used in contemporary English.
[–] englishwebster 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
by trying to suggest that half the population of america is not only worth shooting but you should look forward to doing it.
/u/1quickdub doesnt know any better but thats ok
[–] ABastionOfFreeSpeech 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This ain't gaslighting. False flagging, probably, or an agent provocateur.