[–] Charlez6 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
This whole 'fallacy' phenomenon has been one of the worst and most annoying things to happen to online discussion. They're alleged any bloody time anyone offers any argument or opinion at all, but almost never correctly. What is supposed to be a tool for ensuring quality debate by identifying inaccuracy and disingenuity has instead become a tool for people with a weak position to avoid debate at all while claiming a victory by default!
And fuck you in advance to all the people who are going to point out all the fallacies in this comment!
You're referring to the "fallacy fallacy," which presumes that because an argument is poorly made that the conclusion is false. It is possible to argue incorrectly for a true conclusion just as it is possible to argue cogently for a false conclusion. Either way, the identification of a fallacy is not necessarily a refutation of the argument, especially when the supposed fallacy is incorrectly identified.
[–] OneOfTheBoys [S] ago
Do you mean retards finding out about fallacy terminology without having any logic, reason or intelligence? Because the fallacy concept has been around longer than the internet.
I find you can engage those idiots better than the ones who have no idea of the concept, and think that if they insult you they have won.
[–] OneOfTheBoys [S] ago
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ ... Mylogicalfallacyis.com/stayingonfacebook
[–] AndrewBlazeIt 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Except the slippery slope 100% exists.
[–] TheKobold 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
All of these fallacies can be true. That's the problem with liberals, they read this thing and think anytime something even remotely resembles one it is a key to ignoring it. The ideal of a fallacy is that the argument must be CAREFULLY and THOROUGHLY examined before it can be claimed to be a fallacy.
[–] AndrewBlazeIt 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
idk bro that sounds like a fallacy to me