0
2

[–] 14357085? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

All of these recent hacks are cover ups by google, facebook, twitter, amazon.

They will argue in court that they never sold their data and it was hacked out of them instead.

0
0

[–] 14378052? ago 

Yep, they will scrub the servers and rewrite the code, bring old hardware back on with the correct timestamp. Claim it was China

0
2

[–] 14356188? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Google is fucking EVIL !! Fuck them up Q!

0
2

[–] 14356382? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Which is ironic, since thier motto used to be, "Don't do evil", or something like that. They changed it of course to something less , uh, not sinister...., I forget what.

0
1

[–] 14356556? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

All data would include a lot of DS corruption evidence...

0
0

[–] 14358835? ago 

Wait... Please explain... If fb is listening 24/365... then are those recordings public or private? They exist, right? Can they be obtained through court order? Against HRC, or, any one of us? Why should it even be brought up that our data is recorded...

0
0

[–] 14361316? ago 

for folks that do not know this

0
0

[–] 14361362? ago 

I thought Q implied the FB recordings were being sent to China.

0
0

[–] 14368177? ago 

This submission was linked from this v/QRV submission.

Posted automatically (#3233) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

0
0

[–] 14377982? ago 

Ha, time to send in the US Marshals and forensic analist. They are scrubbing things now. Yesterday when you googled QAnon, you got Q in the first few hits!

0
0

[–] 14358897? ago 

The ultimate proof here, which would condemn fb and goog forever, is if their saved records COULD be obtained and released to the public - against the DNC and HRC. BUT if it's true for them, it's true for us. The byproduct of this is that everyone would recoil against them, therefore they no longer exist!?

0
1

[–] 14355904? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

What good does that do? They can simply delete the data, and there will be no consequences. Hillary and the company hosting her server were ordered to do this, they destroyed everything, and nothing was done.

0
1

[–] 14355984? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I forget where I read it but apparently they were using draft emails thinking that if they didn't send them, there wouldn't be a trail, not realising that the saved drafts was still being recorded by google, and nsa etc.. Something like that, I can't remember where I read it though.. I think it is on an earlier Q drop somewhere..

0
2

[–] 14356668? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This is true, hell you can do a google query and it comes up going back even a few years. Like Q said.

These people are stupid.

0
2

[–] 14357002? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Saving drafts might prevent email traffic, via Mail Transfer Agent (MTA) nodes, but they were still using the internet in general... womp womp womp

0
2

[–] 14357771? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Petraeus and his lover/biographer were sharing info in this manner. Didn’t stop them from getting caught tho

0
0

[–] 14357169? ago 

Email drafts has been a technique out there. But it depends on your shared account not being suponeaed, Google covering your back (which they probably did at times...), your internet traffic blending in with background traffic, all kinds of things.