[–] Reddiggoat ago (edited ago)
dictionary.com
Can't disprove supernatural, can't disprove other realms, don't have any "belief" to support and "disbelief" requires no support.
Those questions further outline that you can't see the difference between "disbelief" and "believing to be false". One doesn't need confirmation to dismiss an idea, just disinterest.
[–] draaaak ago (edited ago)
You sure that's where you got the definition? I see you didn't provide a direct link... maybe that's because that's not the definition they have on their site:
This is what you claimed their definition is:
hmmm... not quite the same, is it?... Seems you might be trying to get away from being a believer in there being no god.
If you are an atheist, then you believe there is no god. If you were unsure, then you would not be an atheist.
Obviously, it's the first definition of "agnostic" that is applicable in this discussion. Agnostics are not just "disbelievers", agnostics are certain that, not only is there no evidence, but that, because of the nature of the supposed "supernatural", acquisition of evidence is impossible.
[–] Reddiggoat ago
Whatever the first google result was then I don't keep track of this stuff. Either way, labels don't really matter to atheists or whatever you want to call us - you get over the "unknowable" pretty quickly and then move on to "don't care".