0
0

[–] Tallest_Skil ago 

  1. The label of “intellectual” is a jewish affectation. It’s Hegelian dialectic designed to psychologically manipulate people into believing “these people have intelligence” and “these people have prestige” based on the etymology.
  2. It pays.
  3. There is no punishment, whatsoever, for being wrong.

1
15

[–] AndrewBlazeIt 1 point 15 points (+16|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Because anyone who self-identifies as an intellectual is a giant faggot, and there's a massive overlap between socialists and giant faggots.

0
0

[–] shawnfromnh69 ago 

Because their meaning of intellectual and the real thinking ability of those that think they are is limited very much by subject. Like a real one, a person that is super smart in the sciences and has many awards and stuff from his work is also as good as Brad Pitt at hooking up with the ladies because that requires an entirely different set of skills. Also the intellectuals have a kind of initiation that if you believe in socialism and they explain it like a Utopia when it's actually not even close and if you don't agree you will find it harder to ascend if your field because like a high school clic there is a social leaders and also a blacklist of you being accepted at the top of your field. Hell Betsy Devos should have a federally given and watched test for their field in teaching and if they can't pass the test and it should be of average ability to pass it fairly simple if you actually know your material even somewhat or are someone that graduated because of their grades and not the skin or gender. Hell we could remove about 1/4 of the bad teachers and replace them with substitutes that can pass the test and then watch them for a while to see if they are normal.

0
3

[–] Enemy_of_time 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I think it's the difference between intelligent and wisdom.

Intellects have a lot of knowledge, they can quote nonsense all day and rattle off an 80 second long coffee order but if you placed them in the streets of Chicago, they'd get raped by 10 niggers in an hour.

Wise men know not to go to the dark streets of Chicago.

0
1

[–] mleczko 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

don't have to be wise, prejudiced is enough.

2
10

[–] kommisar6 2 points 10 points (+12|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Lack of religion. They are suseptible to memes that fill a spiritual void.

0
2

[–] Enemy_of_time 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I use the word "religion" carefully. Because Islam is a religion, and I don't think that would be helpful for any one to have.

I use "faith"

0
0

[–] YugeDick ago 

Muslims have faith too.

Maybe neither is the problem nor the solution.

0
1

[–] Rotteuxx 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Modern Islam is an ideology, it used to be a religion a couple hundreds years ago.

Look into (((who's))) behind Salafi Wahabism & the founding of the House of Saud.

0
6

[–] Rellik88 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Atheist here, not a fucking commie thank you.

0
2

[–] Pluviou5 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

"Equality" is their spiritual deity. You know they're empty inside when they think stealing is generosity.

1
1

[–] NoisyCricket 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Intelligence does not translate to knowledge. I know many people who fall into the genius category and I can assure you they are some of the dumbest, smartest people you will ever meet. Intelligence is not immune to emotion. Intellectuals are simply better at pretending they are immune and therefore rest above. In academic circles they have formalized the abstraction of pretending they are robots up high, led only by empirical facts, and therefore immune to all forms of manipulation, emotional need, and general bullshit which only effects people like "you."

Additionally, socialists and communists have infiltrated academia since the late 1800s in the US. It means those who rise to the top and receive broad attention are statistically more likely to have been crafted in the shop of socialist/communist doctrine. They are inherently biased and their positions are inherently couched as such. Yet they are taught to hide their bias.

The result are pseudo-intellectuals who have themselves been brainwashed into socialism/communism and held high by their other brainwashed peers. Who then go on to publish papers and write books. Who then circle jerk to cite each other. Whereby others hold high by the logical fallacy of plea to authority.

The result is a bunch of idiots lead astray by other idiots who then cite these idiots to reassure themselves that none of them are idiots. Who then use their own bias to tell everyone else who disagrees that those people are idiots. AKA - a cluster fuck of pseudo-intellectualism - which usually leans heavily left.

0
1

[–] Ghetto_Shitlord 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Sounds like any person that uses the term normie. Thanks for the ammo.

1
4

[–] Ajaxofbarbaria 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Pride. They think they are smarter than anyone who has ever tried it before, and therefore they will be able to get it right when they try it. Simple as that.

0
1

[–] kekvanguard 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Real socialism was tried in Sweden and it didn't work out according to their beloved Nordic model they promote for other countries. Sweden is always the end result of socialism when the left assumes full power.

0
0

[–] damnbiker ago 

Because it isn't sprung on them all at once. It begins in elementary school and uses a ratcheting effect so that the by the time they graduate high school, they've either conformed, or their grades aren't sufficient to attend a university. In university, they know that the attending students haven't been taught critical thinking, so they just start filling their heads with crap from over priced textbooks, written by other, already indoctrinated academics.

load more comments ▼ (7 remaining)