0
0

[–] myshpqmc ago 

That's because USA loves rapists.

Rape is nothing and coward USA would let communist rapist free https://www.reddit.com/r/ask/comments/9f7gla/rape_is_nothing_and_coward_usa_would_let/

Slow coward failure America likes to make the war as long as possible, already said far far more earlier and banned.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Kentucky/comments/8oqhe2/china_government_has_legally_stolen_37523/

Is slow coward USA doing the same thing that USA just waits a few months until China yuan is down 10% to $, then dares to tax 10% on $505 billions, and thus gets 10%-10%=0% in real trade? After all, USA has loved China communists and their ZTE for decades. My English is so bad?

1, USA shouts that USA would put tariff on $500 billion goods made in China to change anti-freedom trade with China.

2, China devalues (downs) its currency yuan 10% to USA currency $.

3, then USA dares to really put tariff 10%, and gets nothing in real trade because 10%-10%=0%, which means that prices of goods made in China are decreased 10% by means of China government devaluing yuan 10%, and prices of goods made in China are increased 10% by meanings of USA government putting tariff 10% on all, and thus prices in trade not changed in total.

4, ZTE is always controlled by China communists, and sells anti-freedom system to Iran and Korea, and banned by USA and then supported by USA at last.

Just the first sentence I said, if you cannot read more sentences. "Coward USA is too slow, which would make the war last long and thus make USA fail eventually."

Coward USA is too slow, which would make the war last long and make USA fail. China yuan is already down 4% to USA dollar. So the real tariff in trade would be 10%-4%*500/200=0% for the new 10% tariff on $200 billions of China goods.

Notice: $500 billions is the minimal of goods made in China exported to USA. So China yuan downing (or devaluation of China currency to America currency, now about 4% down) affects more than $500 billions goods exported to USA, but new tariffs expected only affects $200 billions goods exported to USA. So the result of the new tariffs on the whole trade of goods made in China but exported to America here is only 10%-4%*500/200=0%.

Maybe USA can keep torturing Children (news about immigrants) and infants (news about USA believing cow milk is much better than mother milk or breast milk for infants), and make China communists keep stealing $375 billions and millions of American jobs from USA every year, since all these would make America great again.

Is USA a coward failure only shouting 200 billion and shouting 500 billion with doing nothing real while China communists have been keeping beating USA?

The simplest example in life to see the unfair robbery nature of China communists...(rob money from Chinese,rob work from Ameircans)

If you transfer money from banks not in China (for example, D) to China bank,Zero fee. But if you transfer back,that's to say, if you transfer money from China bank to banks not in China (for example,D), very high fee. That's the fairness? So, we got to know why China bank would not like fair competition with other banks, and China communists did unfair competition very well. (By the way, there is a little fact : China top four communist banks are the four biggest and richest banks all over the world. )

China bank says: If you transfer money out of mainland,for example, if you transfer money to USA , the fee is 1‰, 50¥ at least for each.And there is also tele fee,150¥ each time. And there also may be other fees.

So, if you are a Chinese and want to buy an American goods, you transfer 500¥ to your account outside China, and China bank just simply takes off more than 200¥ from you just because you want to buy an American goods. Moreover, if you take this American goods back to China, you may face high tax by China communists as well. So, we got to know why China goods would not like fair competition with USA goods, and China communists did unfair competition very well. (By the way, there is a little fact: China communists legally steal $375 billions and millions of American jobs from USA in 2017 by anti-freedom trade.)

And all above here lasts for decades!

Seen in "China government has legally stolen 375.23 billions from USA in a single year..." http://bbs.aboluowang.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1062885&extra=page%3D2

Edit:I take no order from anyone. For those super Nazis, Can you and the followers read English?

Or you just don't want true free trade without tariffs?

Come on, Nazis and racists and communists, just ignore the truth, attack me and remove.

If no reply or late reply or this removed, blame redd*t and the net, not blame me, because its not my control.

0
0

[–] feral-toes ago 

Because intelligence is graded on a curve.

Plato made this mistake. He thought some people should have the special role of "guardians" and decide public policy. He never asked what the IQ level needed to be a guardian was.

It maybe around 400. Even the cleverest of 2018's humans, with an IQ of perhaps 160, are nowhere near clever enough. And you've got to have the common touch to succeed in democratic politics with universal suffrage, so there is a complication. Either IQ in the range 120 to 130 to be clever but not out of touch, or 150+ and able to fake clever but not out of touch.

So how does civilzation work at all? Humans aren't clever enough to sit down with a blank sheet of paper and design it, so what's the story?

Evolution via competing nation states and incremental adjustment to tradition. Different states have common origins. Their intellectuals meddle. Since they are too stupid to understand, some incremental adjustments to tradition are wise, and some are foolish. Nations become burdened by a "mutation load" of stupid variations of tradition. They fail. Over the centuries natural selection creates civilization.

Why socialism in particular is a question for psychology. What is so attractive, to humans in 2018 and 1917, about "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."? What is so repelling about "Incentives matter. Don't punish the cultivation of abilities. Don't reward falling into need."? Important questions.

But notice the assumption behind the question. It is easier to notice with bit of jargon. "Norm referenced" is grading on a curve. Humans vary and we grade them: clever, average, stupid. "Criterion referenced" is when the pass mark is set by an external standard and is kept the same, even if nobody passes. Humans vary. Marking them on their ability to understand how civilization works, we issue grades: extra-stupid, super-stupid, hyper-stupid. No-one is close to passing.

Ahh, but what of all those conservatives, who argue for tradition, cultivated by modest incrementalism? Try a social change. Wait and see. Back out the failures. Build on the successes. Don't those conservatives pass?

No. They don't pass because they depend on religious faith. They have a vision of tradition found in the bible. They argue "organize society this particular way because God tells us to." That leads to three way split.

  • Oppose all change. For example, slavery is OK because it is in the bible

  • Fancy theology. Some small changes get tried, but arguments that they might have practical benefits have to be dressed up in religious language

  • Hybrid. Half "God tells us". Half "But it works!"

Conservative fail to see that hybrids are unstable. After two hundred years, a hybrid goes all one way or all the other. Either the respect for what works is lost, or something worse happens. Respect for what works takes over and speeds up. Faith is lost. "God tells us" no longer makes people wary of change. Things get changed. But you need to wait a hundred years to see how it all works out. In a decayed hybrid, people try stuff and the people who advocated the change assess it in their own life-times (and declare that it is good for psychological reasons) and build on it and make it impossible to revert. The long term eventual arrives, the changes proves to be for the worse, but it is too late to undo, so people do the stupid-human thing and make up a story about why it was for the best.

Conservatives fail to see because "lasts a lifetime" has two meanings. The personal meaning of "lasts a lifetime" is when you emerge from childhood with a particular hybrid, say 60% faith 40 % pragmatism, and you stick with it for the rest of your days. But the collective meaning of "lasts a lifetime" is when your father is a 60:40 man and brings you up to be 60:40 and you bring your children up to be 60:40.

Does hybrid conservatism last a lifetime? No. Your father was 80:20. He tries to bring you up to be 80:20, but faith is declining more broadly so you grow up 60:40. You try to bring up your child to be 60:40, but faith is declining more broadly, and they grow up 40:60.

Your father was 80:20 all his life. You were 60:40 all you life. Your children are 40:60 for the whole of their lives. Every-one thinks that hybrid conservatism can last because, in their personal experience, it lasted for their own lifetimes. They can also see that society is changing, but cannot understand that this is inherent in a religious/pragmatic hybrid.

So what exactly is the assumption behind the question? It is that humans are clever enough to sustain civilization. We tricky ourselves with norm referenced language, calling some clever and some stupid. But actually, humans are super-stupid and are always falling for something. The Romans fell for Christianity. The Thirty Years way was because Catholics fell for Protestantism. The 18th Century Enlightenment was humans falling for faith/pragmatism hybridization. Which decays in various different ways.

We assume that humans are clever enough to sustain civilization and so "falling for socialism" appears to us to be an anomaly. We hope for a cure, based on understanding this as specific to socialism. But humans will always be falling for some dumb shit.

0
0

[–] Titanbikes4ever ago 

Um... They're not intellectuals if they believe in socialism. If anyone calls themselves an intellectual, that should be your cue that they're a giant faggot and dumb af

0
1

[–] Plavonica 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Intellectual =/= intelligence.

These faggots know they are weak, so they try to make up for it by being intellectual. However, because many are actual fucking morons, they fall hook-line-sinker for socialism.

There are plenty of intelligent people who will never fall for socialism. However, since the morons invaded and took over intellectualism (as a social class), the intelligent stay away from it.

0
0

[–] belrial ago 

It is because they perceive themselves as physically weak, therefore they think that using "superior intellect" they can get everyone to share their weakness. Up until the '70's most Americans who were in a weak position perceived themselves as temporarily down, and would get back on their feet. After decades of being told that it is "the strong holding down the weak and we need to stick it to the man!" people have begun to accept weakness as a virtue instead of a temporary setback.

I wish I could find the author who said "The biggest reason socialism does not take hold in America is because most people view themselves as embarrassed millionaires."

Now that is no longer the case and a lot of people have given up on the American dream that if you work, invest, use your head, and keep your wits about you you will succeed.

1
-1

[–] mleczko 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

because they are literally weak. and the earth shall inherit the strong.

0
0

[–] Mr_Woodblock ago  (edited ago)

Maybe because they've read about it and thought it was a good idea. Lol. Would they support it if they thought it was a bad idea? Ez question

0
0

[–] damnbiker ago 

Because it isn't sprung on them all at once. It begins in elementary school and uses a ratcheting effect so that the by the time they graduate high school, they've either conformed, or their grades aren't sufficient to attend a university. In university, they know that the attending students haven't been taught critical thinking, so they just start filling their heads with crap from over priced textbooks, written by other, already indoctrinated academics.

load more comments ▼ (7 remaining)