0
0

[–] Titanbikes4ever ago 

Um... They're not intellectuals if they believe in socialism. If anyone calls themselves an intellectual, that should be your cue that they're a giant faggot and dumb af

0
0

[–] belrial ago 

It is because they perceive themselves as physically weak, therefore they think that using "superior intellect" they can get everyone to share their weakness. Up until the '70's most Americans who were in a weak position perceived themselves as temporarily down, and would get back on their feet. After decades of being told that it is "the strong holding down the weak and we need to stick it to the man!" people have begun to accept weakness as a virtue instead of a temporary setback.

I wish I could find the author who said "The biggest reason socialism does not take hold in America is because most people view themselves as embarrassed millionaires."

Now that is no longer the case and a lot of people have given up on the American dream that if you work, invest, use your head, and keep your wits about you you will succeed.

0
0

[–] Mr_Woodblock ago  (edited ago)

Maybe because they've read about it and thought it was a good idea. Lol. Would they support it if they thought it was a bad idea? Ez question

0
0

[–] damnbiker ago 

Because it isn't sprung on them all at once. It begins in elementary school and uses a ratcheting effect so that the by the time they graduate high school, they've either conformed, or their grades aren't sufficient to attend a university. In university, they know that the attending students haven't been taught critical thinking, so they just start filling their heads with crap from over priced textbooks, written by other, already indoctrinated academics.

0
0

[–] shawnfromnh69 ago 

Because their meaning of intellectual and the real thinking ability of those that think they are is limited very much by subject. Like a real one, a person that is super smart in the sciences and has many awards and stuff from his work is also as good as Brad Pitt at hooking up with the ladies because that requires an entirely different set of skills. Also the intellectuals have a kind of initiation that if you believe in socialism and they explain it like a Utopia when it's actually not even close and if you don't agree you will find it harder to ascend if your field because like a high school clic there is a social leaders and also a blacklist of you being accepted at the top of your field. Hell Betsy Devos should have a federally given and watched test for their field in teaching and if they can't pass the test and it should be of average ability to pass it fairly simple if you actually know your material even somewhat or are someone that graduated because of their grades and not the skin or gender. Hell we could remove about 1/4 of the bad teachers and replace them with substitutes that can pass the test and then watch them for a while to see if they are normal.

0
0

[–] Tallest_Skil ago 

  1. The label of “intellectual” is a jewish affectation. It’s Hegelian dialectic designed to psychologically manipulate people into believing “these people have intelligence” and “these people have prestige” based on the etymology.
  2. It pays.
  3. There is no punishment, whatsoever, for being wrong.

1
-1

[–] mleczko 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

because they are literally weak. and the earth shall inherit the strong.