[–] WolfLovesTrump 0 points 17 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago
How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)? YOU MAKE THE DEMOCRATS DEMAND IT! HAHAHAHA. These people are: ______!
[–] Ramon710 0 points 16 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago
I think that at the beginning the idea might have been to keep the interviews down to a few people, but maybe it was the FBI itself, Military Intelligence or the NSA that made Trump aware of the great opportunity that this investigation will provide.
The Dems went out of their way and overextended themselves, and obviously committed crimes or violated Congress rules and regulations, to stop Kavanaugh.
They are indeed STUPID. Now more evidence has been obtained. This might also open the door to introduce other evidence that the Q group already has on several individuals.
[–] Michael3500BC 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
And here is the warrant provided by the DNC
[–] Gorillion 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Another theory was that it's a shot across the bow of the dem's collective intention to keep being obstructionist.
The current remit allows Trump to officially collate a huge amount of wrongs/abuses of process committed by his opponents, and wave threat of prosecution in their faces (separate to the more serious sealed indictment stuff - that's clearly going to be a bloodbath). Essentially giving him free reign to continue with his MAGA agenda without spooking the normies.
[–] WinOneForTheQuipper 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Sounds like good leverage to me.
[–] TRFBYTrC0mmies 0 points 11 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago
And this is in addition to his ‘this investigation might be a blessing in disguise’ tweet. Seems like POTUS is about to drop-kick somebody, hopefully Chinastein, right in her lying fkn face hole.
[–] CB4891 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Think this may have been part of the reason Feistein looked so confused/scared shitless when the announcement of the investigation was made in the committee meeting? No doubt, the Dems pressuring Flake to do it thought that he'd reject the idea outright. That coupled with the video of the elevator ambush by the Soros plants played repeatedly on MSNBC and CNN afterwards would have allowed them to pile on with the same old "Republicans Hate Women" bullshit rhetoric and earn a few points with the normies.
[–] Jim_Bob 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
"Whoever they deem appropriate." And THIS is the real game plan. Thank you, Sen. Flake.
BTW, an interesting connection that has not been discussed is Chrissy's BFF who she claims was at the party (but who denies that she was or ever met Judge K), is Leland Ingham Keyser.
10 years later, Leland would marry Democrat operative Bob Beckel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Beckel
Have they talked about THAT on "The Five?"
[–] theoldones 0 points 36 points 36 points (+36|-0) ago
every time i look at a trump tweet and scroll down im reminded of how vile and evil leftists are.
[–] WanderingTaurus 0 points 16 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago
Never scroll down.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
[–] Xorg 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
This was the meme I saw immediately below POTUS' tweet
[–] Michael3500BC ago
Good advice. Never go full retard.
[–] BIGLETTERS 0 points 14 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago
Ugh I was just thinking this... They are so lost.
[–] theoldones 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
"everyone i dont like is a fraternity of rapists controlled by russia"
[–] True344 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
They are indeed but remember twatter does this deliberately, there are tons of supports.
They just are placed down further.
It's a fake facade, hoping something replaces it later with less bias down the line.
[–] ideologicidal 2 points 2 points 4 points (+4|-2) ago
Free speech can be ugly.
[–] SIayfire122 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
So can ethnic cleansing.
[–] VoatsNewfag ago
Maybe in so far that it's twitter itself that censors and not a government. But afaik twitter isn't a free speech platform.