[–] drakesdoom2 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
Don't play their games play ours "communist helicopter drop"
[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
They will constantly change the rules
This is a good thing. Over time it erodes their credibility with normies.
[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Beat them at their own game and then beat them at ours.
[–] fellowkikepeople 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Controlling the use of language isn't "their" game and is actually very important. The MSM spends a lot of time twisting stories with the use of different words alone.
Terrorist or freedom fighter?
[–] captainstrange ago (edited ago)
One fights for freedom, the other fights freedom itself, unless we're talking about sand monkies.
Tactics are moral-free except to morons.
One day you'll be labelled a terrorist for simply speaking the truth.
[–] kneo24 4 points 16 points 20 points (+20|-4) ago
Why? I imagine what they will do is redefine "speech diversity" as something else entirely. They already think diversity is "everyone is brown" and people of color as "everyone is brown". To them, diversity of thought is, "only black people should speak".
[–] Sockhereye [S] 2 points 21 points 23 points (+23|-2) ago (edited ago)
It has major comedy potential.
It forces them to reject one of their own totemic words, even if just in a limited context. This will fuck with them.
There are clear analogies between Muslims, ghetto blacks, and other groups who are generally wrongthinkers by non-adjusted leftist standards, being included in diversity and other types of wrongthinkers (like us "nahtzees") being included in speech diversity. We can force them to confront the negative aspects of social diversity via analogy to the speech they already hate. Sure, the hardcore leftists will just handwave it away with some bullshit, but that'll make them look stupid and hypocritical to normies which is fun.
[–] kneo24 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
I posit the normies opinion doesn't matter that much anymore. Look no further than the boomers that arrived here and cried about racism and how it should not be allowed. They won't even stand for free speech because they were offended. The only thing you accomplish is making them look hypocritical and stupid to people who are already aware. It's fun for you, and maybe an amusement to others, but it's nothing new. It's not a novel idea like you're making it out to be.
Make them play by your rules instead of playing by theirs.
[–] AlaricTheFirst 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
So crazy it may just work. I like “diversity of speech” though.
[–] middle_path 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
So you eat the same food for every meal, every day?
[–] TeranNotTerran 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Goy, we need more diversity in speech. Let the dark skinned man talk, please.
I actually like this. Very clever.
[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
We will use "speaker diversity isn't speech diversity" as our own "hate speech isn't free speech."
[–] [deleted] 0 points 38 points 38 points (+38|-0) ago
[–] shekelforce 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Those damn evil grabblers....
[–] GDCommieUSA 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
What about "politically diverse" speech or PD speech to combat PC speech?
[–] Whiteymcwhitebelt ago
Calling them all Jews is not accurate. The bush family aren't Jews and neither are the Kennedy's
[–] captainstrange 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Feudalism happened because rome ran out of money, or wherewithal and collapsed.
People sometimes call it the loss of 'social technology' or some shit.
In any case, really tells you what is going on. The bubble to end all bubbles.
What are your thoughts Mylon? I read your comments every chance I get.
[–] Mylon 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
Most structures arise as a result of the environment they grow up in. Personal property is such a natural thing that we accept without question, but it too deceptively extends to the concept of private property and it quickly becomes a method by which people can be taxed. e.g, give me 20% of your grain and I will graciously allow you to farm on my property. And then use some of that money to pay thugs that enforce my property claim on those that don't pay my tax.
Capitalism is quickly reverting to this state, where entrepeneurship is nearly impossible and instead people must acquire permission via legislators and patent holders and established industry networks to be allowed to produce, and thus consenting to being taxed far more than they typically pay income tax. Unions managed to reduce this tax burden via negotiating power, but they've been systematically dismantled.
If the common man does not have economic power, he also does not have poltical power.
[–] ExterminateAllKikes 2 points 9 points 11 points (+11|-2) ago
Bullshit. I will take feudalism in a heartbeat over the jews controlling America. Destroy the central banks and exterminate the jews.
If you think I am deceiving, explain why one goes to prison in Germany (and many other countries) if you question the fake jew holocaust? Besides Hitler doing nothing wrong, what is your argument?
[–] lemon11 ago
Just like how we could brand white genocide as "racism." They would have to redefine it in even stronger communist terms to get away from that. Oh...
[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
And them redefining racism to make it impossible to be racist against whites redpilled a lot of normies.