4
16

[–] kneo24 4 points 16 points (+20|-4) ago 

Why? I imagine what they will do is redefine "speech diversity" as something else entirely. They already think diversity is "everyone is brown" and people of color as "everyone is brown". To them, diversity of thought is, "only black people should speak".

0
0

[–] NiggadermCQ ago 

Eubonics is diverse speech.

We did du nuffin.

2
21

[–] Sockhereye [S] 2 points 21 points (+23|-2) ago  (edited ago)

  1. It has major comedy potential.

  2. It forces them to reject one of their own totemic words, even if just in a limited context. This will fuck with them.

  3. There are clear analogies between Muslims, ghetto blacks, and other groups who are generally wrongthinkers by non-adjusted leftist standards, being included in diversity and other types of wrongthinkers (like us "nahtzees") being included in speech diversity. We can force them to confront the negative aspects of social diversity via analogy to the speech they already hate. Sure, the hardcore leftists will just handwave it away with some bullshit, but that'll make them look stupid and hypocritical to normies which is fun.

0
1

[–] AlaricTheFirst 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

So crazy it may just work. I like “diversity of speech” though.

0
2

[–] epik- 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

"Diversity of speech" sounds much better than 'diversity speech'

0
9

[–] kneo24 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

I posit the normies opinion doesn't matter that much anymore. Look no further than the boomers that arrived here and cried about racism and how it should not be allowed. They won't even stand for free speech because they were offended. The only thing you accomplish is making them look hypocritical and stupid to people who are already aware. It's fun for you, and maybe an amusement to others, but it's nothing new. It's not a novel idea like you're making it out to be.

Make them play by your rules instead of playing by theirs.

2
0

[–] drakesdoom2 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

Don't play their games play ours "communist helicopter drop"

0
2

[–] fellowkikepeople 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Controlling the use of language isn't "their" game and is actually very important. The MSM spends a lot of time twisting stories with the use of different words alone.

Terrorist or freedom fighter?

0
0

[–] captainstrange ago  (edited ago)

One fights for freedom, the other fights freedom itself, unless we're talking about sand monkies.

Tactics are moral-free except to morons.

One day you'll be labelled a terrorist for simply speaking the truth.

1
-1

[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Beat them at their own game and then beat them at ours.

0
1

[–] kneo24 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Bingo. They don't play by their own rules and never will. They will constantly change the rules to suit them when you come up with a "gotcha". The trick is to make them play by your rules instead.

1
-1

[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

They will constantly change the rules

This is a good thing. Over time it erodes their credibility with normies.

0
0

[–] lemon11 ago 

Just like how we could brand white genocide as "racism." They would have to redefine it in even stronger communist terms to get away from that. Oh...

1
1

[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

And them redefining racism to make it impossible to be racist against whites redpilled a lot of normies.