[–] Vampyregod ago
Why not just call it speech. Why an extra label? We are not labelists
[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
We are not labelists
Who said? Labels are powerful. That's like saying "we're not gunnists" in a war.
[–] MANsplatter ago
How about letting people call it what they want? Because freedom?
[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
A suggestion is not a demand you autist.
[–] jeffwingersballs 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
cute idea, but it's most likely going to fail. semantical games are a from the play book of the left and comedians. try to build a joke around it and see where that takes you.
[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
This whole culture war so far has been fought with words. Everything we've gained so far has been because of what you call "semantical games". Don't underestimate their power. Meme magic is real.
[–] middle_path 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
So you eat the same food for every meal, every day?
[–] thatcoolmartian ago
Didn't we already kind of try that with 'diversity of thought'. The left won't care, they have to standard's, they know full well that diversity is blacks only. Call them on it all you want they have no standards.
[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Getting rid of the "of" implies that speech diversity (or idea diversity, thought diversity, however you want to say it) implies that the concept is more integral and implicit to diversity as a whole and drives them wild.
Which is why we should reveal this as much as possible.