0
1

[–] CMAnon 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Good luck with that. The left controls education and media in the country and have appropriated definitions. This is a serious matter that Trump needs to address going forward. I know of only 3 colleges/universities that aren't infiltrated with communists...Hillsdale, Liberty University and Grove City, I'm sure there are a few others but these don't take public money so they aren't controlled by the left. Trump said at the UN we will only give foreign aid to friendly countries. He should have a litmus test that colleges and universities need to pass before getting any governmental aid. Perhaps he should only put money into community colleges and technical schools that are focused on graduating people with skills to enter the workforce. Political science, gender studies, social justice, etc. should be done away with. Politics should not be considered a profession.

0
0

[–] Goat-Master-5000 ago 

What about the four men's colleges left in America?

  • Morehouse College (a black college, I think)
  • Hampden-Sydney College
  • Saint John's University
  • Wabash College

Deep Springs College just went co-ed after a long legal battle, but I'd be amazed if any woman wants to go there.

I know little about them, but I'd be surprised if they were Communist as well.

0
0

[–] pdeee ago 

Hate diversity is not diversity.

0
4

[–] Whitemail 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

They control the MSM, so they have control over the terminology. What they labeled the alternative influence network (AIN) actually has a lot of diversity instead of the ridiculous unity found among the controlled MSM.

0
0

[–] Vampyregod ago 

Why not just call it speech. Why an extra label? We are not labelists

1
-1

[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

We are not labelists

Who said? Labels are powerful. That's like saying "we're not gunnists" in a war.

0
0

[–] Vampyregod ago 

Then call it expressive authenticity

0
0

[–] thatcoolmartian ago 

Didn't we already kind of try that with 'diversity of thought'. The left won't care, they have to standard's, they know full well that diversity is blacks only. Call them on it all you want they have no standards.

1
-1

[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Getting rid of the "of" implies that speech diversity (or idea diversity, thought diversity, however you want to say it) implies that the concept is more integral and implicit to diversity as a whole and drives them wild.

Call them on it all you want they have no standards

Which is why we should reveal this as much as possible.

0
0

[–] Blacksdonttip ago 

"Diversity of thought/ideas" is already a pretty common phrase. I invoke it often when discussing the matter, but as expected it's met with manufactured outrage and vague claims of harassment/ risk to safety. There's no reasoning with those that act and think based entirely on emotion.

1
-1

[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

There's no reasoning with those that act and think based entirely on emotion.

True, but revealing the fact that they are hyperemotional lunatics is a good thing. And getting rid of the "of" implies that speech diversity (or idea diversity, thought diversity, however you want to say it) implies that the concept is more integral and implicit to diversity as a whole and drives them wild.

0
1

[–] Kekmet-Peperoni 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

making speech "stronger". love it.

0
0

[–] RickFlairWOOOOOO ago 

speech diversity is White culture. the rest of the world Shuts the fuck up and does what they are told. Time to humble ourselves.... eh... just saying hypothetical crazy shit... you see they can be logical but unreasonable too...

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)