0
0

[–] thatcoolmartian ago 

Didn't we already kind of try that with 'diversity of thought'. The left won't care, they have to standard's, they know full well that diversity is blacks only. Call them on it all you want they have no standards.

1
-1

[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Getting rid of the "of" implies that speech diversity (or idea diversity, thought diversity, however you want to say it) implies that the concept is more integral and implicit to diversity as a whole and drives them wild.

Call them on it all you want they have no standards

Which is why we should reveal this as much as possible.

0
1

[–] wps9d0 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Welcome to Voat! The home of speech diversity.

0
0

[–] kissaki ago 

This the angle we need for everything.

The Socratic Method is all about using peoples' own bullshit against them, or at least tripping them up in it.

"I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves. ---Matthew 10:16

0
1

[–] ExterminateAllKikes 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

As long as we do the final solution. Yeah, then we can have free speech.

0
1

[–] TeranNotTerran 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Goy, we need more diversity in speech. Let the dark skinned man talk, please.

I actually like this. Very clever.

1
0

[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

We will use "speaker diversity isn't speech diversity" as our own "hate speech isn't free speech."

0
0

[–] pdeee ago 

Hate diversity is not diversity.

0
0

[–] Vampyregod ago 

Why not just call it speech. Why an extra label? We are not labelists

1
-1

[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

We are not labelists

Who said? Labels are powerful. That's like saying "we're not gunnists" in a war.

0
0

[–] Vampyregod ago 

Then call it expressive authenticity

0
0

[–] Blacksdonttip ago 

"Diversity of thought/ideas" is already a pretty common phrase. I invoke it often when discussing the matter, but as expected it's met with manufactured outrage and vague claims of harassment/ risk to safety. There's no reasoning with those that act and think based entirely on emotion.

1
-1

[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

There's no reasoning with those that act and think based entirely on emotion.

True, but revealing the fact that they are hyperemotional lunatics is a good thing. And getting rid of the "of" implies that speech diversity (or idea diversity, thought diversity, however you want to say it) implies that the concept is more integral and implicit to diversity as a whole and drives them wild.

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)