[–] ExterminateAllKikes 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
As long as we do the final solution. Yeah, then we can have free speech.
[–] TeranNotTerran 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Goy, we need more diversity in speech. Let the dark skinned man talk, please.
I actually like this. Very clever.
[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
We will use "speaker diversity isn't speech diversity" as our own "hate speech isn't free speech."
[–] divine_human ago
replace 'diversity' with 'variety' and all the divisive woo-woo goes away.
[–] RickFlairWOOOOOO ago
speech diversity is White culture. the rest of the world Shuts the fuck up and does what they are told. Time to humble ourselves.... eh... just saying hypothetical crazy shit... you see they can be logical but unreasonable too...
[–] Blacksdonttip ago
"Diversity of thought/ideas" is already a pretty common phrase. I invoke it often when discussing the matter, but as expected it's met with manufactured outrage and vague claims of harassment/ risk to safety. There's no reasoning with those that act and think based entirely on emotion.
[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
There's no reasoning with those that act and think based entirely on emotion.
True, but revealing the fact that they are hyperemotional lunatics is a good thing. And getting rid of the "of" implies that speech diversity (or idea diversity, thought diversity, however you want to say it) implies that the concept is more integral and implicit to diversity as a whole and drives them wild.
[–] wps9d0 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Welcome to Voat! The home of speech diversity.