[–] Womb_Raider 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago
No we shouldn't. Don't adopt their verbiage, that's what they want. They want to change the culture. By adopting their terms, we're bending to their will.
Free speech is free speech. Free is liberty. Do not remove the word liberty. You will be doing long term damage by doing so.
This is the country of freedom. Long live the free United States. I'll die with a rifle in my hand before I allow that to disappear.
[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
"Diversity" is a word they hijacked, not their verbiage. Taking it back is bending them to our will, not bending to theirs.
Plus you can use free speech and speech diversity together. I just used "rebrand" in the title to make the point clear. "Speech diversity" is the cheek retractor used to force them to swallow the free speech pill.
[–] Womb_Raider ago
If you weren't SoapBox scum you'd have gotten an upvoat from me. It's not often you all agree with me.
[–] madmardigan 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
A possible way to red pill the willing. But most are far too stuck in the clouds of their self righteousness.
[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
"Speaker diversity isn't speech diversity." can be our "hate speech isn't free speech."
[–] MANsplatter ago
How about letting people call it what they want? Because freedom?
[–] Sockhereye [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
A suggestion is not a demand you autist.
[–] ExterminateAllKikes 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
As long as we do the final solution. Yeah, then we can have free speech.