[–] Duke_Nucleon ago
As one of many famous labs that have lost the century-old, greatest race in physics to derive fundamental constants from 1st principles, one might think symmetrymagazine.org articles might focus on retooling and rethinking assumptions (e.g., continuous space-time theory on which Standard Model and General Relativity math are based), much like sports teams analyze why they lost a game (or in this case, the championship).
[–] flowerchild ago
Unless the observable pattern of known history changes, in 500 years much of today's science will be seen as a rudimentary but necessary foundation.
[–] projection 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
That's funny considering you believe NIST on 9/11.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
[–] NoisyCricket 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
In fact there is an ever larger growing body of evidence that we may have taken some seriously wrong turns in physics, astronomy, and archeology, to name a few, as far back as 100-150 years ago. Chances are there will be an upheaval to varying degrees throughout sometime over the next twenty to fifty years.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] Artooweaboo 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Any sources you'd like to share on this?